mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) (07/09/85)
In article <28200028@inmet.UUCP> nrh@inmet.UUCP writes: >>And the third >>important question: how do you prevent the rich from subverting a system in >>which the right to property is supreme? >The right to property is not "supreme" in the sense that it gives you >other rights. In particular, a person who owns a million acres has >no choices about what you do on your single acre. I was using "Supreme" in the sense that it seems to me that when there is a conflict between the right to private property and any other right, property always wins. If I have the wrong impression, then I'd like to see some systematization of how you resolve the conflicts. Charley Wingate umcp-cs!mangoe "You've disintegrated Einstein!"