arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold%CGL) (06/23/85)
The following is a fix for the ring of protection from shape changers. The problem is that, if one is swallowed by a chameleon masquerading as a trapper, and then one puts on a ring of protection from shape changers, one instantly dies because of it, since you are now inside a non-swallowing monster. I figure that if you put on a ring to protect you from a monster, it shouldn't make that monster kill you. Here is a context diff which fixes this problem. ----- CUT HERE ----- *** /tmp/,RCSt1007456 Tue Jun 18 16:12:59 1985 --- hack.mon.c Tue Jun 18 12:07:34 1985 *************** *** 627,632 unstuck(mtmp) register struct monst *mtmp; { if(u.ustuck == mtmp) { if(u.uswallow){ u.ux = mtmp->mx; --- 627,635 ----- unstuck(mtmp) register struct monst *mtmp; { + extern coord enexto(); + coord mm; + if(u.ustuck == mtmp) { if(u.uswallow){ u.ux = mtmp->mx; *************** *** 632,637 u.ux = mtmp->mx; u.uy = mtmp->my; u.uswallow = 0; setsee(); docrt(); } --- 635,643 ----- u.ux = mtmp->mx; u.uy = mtmp->my; u.uswallow = 0; + mm = enexto(u.ux, u.uy); + mtmp->mx = mm.x; + mtmp->my = mm.y; setsee(); docrt(); } *************** *** 787,792 if(mdat->mlet == 'w' && getwn(mtmp)) initworm(mtmp); /* perhaps we should clear mtmp->mtame here? */ #endif NOWORM unpmon(mtmp); /* necessary for 'I' and to force pmon */ pmon(mtmp); return(1); --- 793,802 ----- if(mdat->mlet == 'w' && getwn(mtmp)) initworm(mtmp); /* perhaps we should clear mtmp->mtame here? */ #endif NOWORM + unstuck(mtmp); + mtmp->mflee = 0; + mtmp->mfleetim = 0; + mtmp->mpeaceful = 0; unpmon(mtmp); /* necessary for 'I' and to force pmon */ pmon(mtmp); return(1);
rcj@burl.UUCP (Curtis Jackson) (06/26/85)
In article <554@ucsfcgl.UUCP> arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP () writes: >The following is a fix for the ring of protection from shape changers. >The problem is that, if one is swallowed by a chameleon masquerading as >a trapper, and then one puts on a ring of protection from shape >changers, one instantly dies because of it, since you are now inside a >non-swallowing monster. I figure that if you put on a ring to protect >you from a monster, it shouldn't make that monster kill you. Here is a >context diff which fixes this problem. <<<flame on!!>>> WHY!!?? What you are describing is the equivalent of putting on your seatbelt as you go over a cliff, then dying in the crash's fire because you can't get your seatbelt off fast enough. If you are eaten by a shape-changer you have already made_your_mistake/had_your_bad_luck and will (probably) die. Life (hack) is a bitch, let's keep it that way or hack will turn into a milquetoast game in no time. "Mommy! Mommy! I picked up the cat by the tail and it scratched me!" "I'm sorry, dear; I'll go kill that nasty cat right away so you never have to deal with it again." POPPYCOCK and STUFF!! <<<flame off>>> -- The MAD Programmer -- 919-228-3313 (Cornet 291) alias: Curtis Jackson ...![ ihnp4 ulysses cbosgd mgnetp ]!burl!rcj ...![ ihnp4 cbosgd akgua masscomp ]!clyde!rcj
arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Ken Arnold%CGL) (07/03/85)
In article <760@burl.UUCP> rcj@burl.UUCP (Curtis Jackson) writes: >In article <554@ucsfcgl.UUCP> arnold@ucsfcgl.UUCP () writes: >>The following is a fix for the ring of protection from shape changers. >>The problem is that, if one is swallowed by a chameleon masquerading as >>a trapper, and then one puts on a ring of protection from shape >>changers, one instantly dies because of it, since you are now inside a >>non-swallowing monster. I figure that if you put on a ring to protect >>you from a monster, it shouldn't make that monster kill you. Here is a >>context diff which fixes this problem. ><<<flame on!!>>> >WHY!!?? What you are describing is the equivalent of putting on your >seatbelt as you go over a cliff, then dying in the crash's fire because >you can't get your seatbelt off fast enough. Of course, dear. Calm down and stick this sock in your mouth and listen to mother... :-> It seems to me that, as soon as a chameleon has changed into a Dragon, I am in big trouble. However, if I put on my protection ring **poof!** I am protected from the Dragon. Now, when I've been swallowed by a chameleon posing as a trapper, I am in big trouble. However, if I put on my protection ring **poof!** I am dead. Uh, does this seem consistent? Can you so "no it doesn't?" I knew that you could. I just figure that if it claims on the label to protect you, killing you instead isn't proper behavior. Ken Arnold P.S. Of course, if you don't LIKE the fix you don't gotta install it...