[net.religion.christian] Anglican and Catholic recognition of sacraments

mat@hou4b.UUCP (Mark Terribile) (02/24/85)

>> We do recognize as binding each others baptism and marriage since the
>> ministers of these need not be clergy in baptism and must be the couple
>> in marriage.

Curiously, what I was taught in High School (Archbishop Stepinac in White
Plains, NY) is that under certain conditions, the Catholic Baptism can be
administered by a non-Catholic ... and even by a non-Christian.  The
requirements, as I recall them, are that

	The individual being baptized is not capable at the moment of an
	act of will which would amount to Baptism.

	The person, or other persons responsible (most often parents of an
	infant) are believed to desire the Baptism.

	The person is in immediate danger of death.

	No persons more qualified to administer the Baptism (ie no Catholics)
	are present.

	The person administering the Baptism has to actually desire that the
	Baptism take place ... in other words, his prayer/desire must be
	sincere, and not simply play acting.  I don't quite understand if
	this means that	 he must accept Christianity for the moment, or only
	make the conditional act of will that ``if Christianity/Catholocism
	is correct, then ...''.

Of course, this should all be taken as my recollection and NOT as a definitive
statemtn of Catholic teaching.
-- 

	from Mole End			Mark Terribile
		(scrape .. dig )	hou4b!mat
    ,..      .,,       ,,,   ..,***_*.