laura@utzoo.UUCP (Laura Creighton) (04/18/85)
I thought that it was agreed that Mark was used as source for Luke and Matthew, as well as a lost ``Q'' document. The Mark and Q authors didn't know of each other's work, and the author of John probably knew but was writing from another perspective. Who disagrees with this theory? Wait...wait...who AUTHORATIVELY disagrees with this theory? Laura Creighton utzoo!laura