[net.religion.christian] Black is white

shindman@utcs.UUCP (Paul Shindman) (08/02/85)

In article <3369@decwrl.UUCP> black@pundit.DEC  writes:
>
>
>     Somehow, Rich, your information is flawed as usual. 

As long as Don Black continues to ignore facts/truth, people will
be forced to question his own version of "facts/truths".  He will
continue to preach his own dogma, as offensive and flawed as it is.

Many months ago Black claimed he never posted without having two
sources to back him up.  His previous postings contained very
questionable material (if not complete falsehoods) and many net readers,
including myself, asked him publicly to explain himself and back
up his bizarre claims with some factual evidence.  He never did, of
course.  Now Don Black is back at it again and we cannot expect to
see much in the way of factual evidence from recognized sources.

Unfortunately, Black is incorrigible.  People will continue to 
rub his nose in facts and Black will continue to ignore 
established fact and ignore acknowledged history. He will continue to
post material to the net that the majority of us consider offensive.
-- 
-----------------
Paul Shindman, U of T Computing Services, Toronto (416) 978-6878
USENET: {ihnp4|decvax}!utcs!shindman
BITNET: paulie at utoronto     IP SHARP MAIL: uoft