melanie@cornell.UUCP (01/22/85)
From: melanie (Melanie Nesheim) <line-muncher> A friend who has been reading net.religion.christian but can't post to it directly asked me (Melanie) to forward this to it: Date: 22 January 85 14:16 EST Subject: Article for net.religion.christian (Trinity) To: MELANIE@CRNLCS.BITNET This is intended to be neither answer nor argument, but simply a tidbit to share with all. I was raised in the Catholic church, and never understood the teaching of the Trinity... it was always far too complex and above my understanding. But when I heard this, it helped me to understand it better (no, unfortunately I didn't receive this in the Catholic church). How can God be one and three at the same time? And how can He be one of the three without compromising part of the One? Bumfuzzled!! Think of the sun as an illustration. The sun is one thing, yet it gives off three things: light, heat, and radiation. The light is something in itself, yet it can happen without compromising its source. The same is true of the other two elements. And the three things which emerge from the one have entirely different effects on the things they touch. Yet the sun doesn't change in order to accomplish all three things. It can go on and on. I think it's also interesting to note that a parallel of sorts is drawn in the last book of the Old Testament between God and the sun: "And the Sun of Righteousness shall arise with healing in His wings..." (I've heard it said that the word translated "wings" can refer to something likened to rays of light.) "The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall not want..." Jennifer Moore
melanie@cornell.UUCP (01/25/85)
From: melanie (Melanie Nesheim) It was neat to find Chuck Hedrick using the word "aspects" to describe the Trinity. That's how I've thought of it for a long time: that there are three aspects to God, but He is still one being, not three beings. However, I wasn't sure how to explain it so it would make sense to others. Chuck did an excellent job with that, and with overviewing the positions of the various churches on the Trinity. My experience is in agreement with his overview. --Melanie
edwardsb@harvard.ARPA (Bill Edwards) (01/28/85)
> From: melanie (Melanie Nesheim) > > It was neat to find Chuck Hedrick using the word "aspects" > to describe the Trinity. That's how I've thought of it for a long > time: that there are three aspects to God, but He is still one > being, not three beings. However, I wasn't sure how to explain it > so it would make sense to others. Chuck did an excellent job with that, > and with overviewing the positions of the various churches on the > Trinity. My experience is in agreement with his overview. > --Melanie My only problem with this terminology is that it has a tendency towards modalism. It looks like the Persons of the Trinity are more than just 'aspects'--they certainly are distinguishable entities (for lack of a better description) in the New Testament. The paradox is that God is one essence and three persons at the same time. If you don't keep this tension in perfect balance, you veer off either into tritheism--or into a denial of the personhood of Christ and the Holy Spirit. In the end, though, one has to admit that the Trinity is a mystery which we cannot comprehend, but which should move us to awe. Bill Edwards
susan@lmef.UUCP (susan) (07/29/85)
*Ahem* Hello. I am not very good with speeches or clever logic, but I thought that maybe some of you (like me) have pondered the Trinity. Since I am not good at saying things outside of poems, I thought I would contribute my thoughts on the Trinity. I do not understand eternity (and neither do I comprehend all that is forever beginning and all that never ends.) It boggles my limited mind, yet I know that the One whose name is eternal, He is Father, Spirit, and Son. How can Three be One, and One be Three? But, if faith, hope and love abide in one heart, then it can be. I am honestly and sincerely interested in opinions, thoughts or comments that any of you may have about this..... -- susan {ihnp4,akgua}!sol1!lmef!susan
dkl@usl.UUCP (Dwayne K. Lanclos) (07/29/85)
In article <1731@reed.UUCP> purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva) writes: > I'm a Christian. I'm "born again" (a phrase that I dislike using > greatly) in that I believe in Jesus Christ and I believe in the power of > the Holy Spirit, although I must confess that I'm not a trinitarian (sp?) > and believe that the Holy Spirit is the same thing as God, in essence. > cheers - > > elizabeth g. purtell > > (Lady Godiva) Of course the Holy Spirit is the same thing as God! That's what the concept of the Trinity means: one God demonstrating three different aspects. Down through history, the experience of God has been that which gives life and meaning to our existence (the Father), as realized in human history (the Son), and as the spirit dwelling within each of us (the Holy Spirit). The Trinity is the formulation used to express this experience in language: three persons in one God. ----------- Come to the shell for answers. dwayne {akgua, ut-sally}!usl!dkl
purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva) (08/02/85)
In article <603@usl.UUCP> dkl@usl.UUCP (Dwayne K. Lanclos) writes: >Of course the Holy Spirit is the same thing as God! That's what the >concept of the Trinity means: one God demonstrating three different aspects. >Down through history, the experience of God has been that which gives life >and meaning to our existence (the Father), as realized in human history >(the Son), and as the spirit dwelling within each of us (the Holy Spirit). >The Trinity is the formulation used to express this experience in language: >three persons in one God. Ok. Although that is the orthodox definition of the Trinity, I've known many trinitarians who did not believe this. They believed in three separate, destinct entities. And if we're defining being a trinitarian as believing that there are three different aspects of God, I happen to believe that there are far more than three. But I don't really care what people believe about the godhead, it doesn't make any difference to your Christianity as far as I'm concerned. So I hope that this doesn't get into a discussion about trinity vs oneness vs ... cheers - elizabeth g. purtell (Lady Godiva)
homeier@aero.ARPA (Peter Homeier ) (08/06/85)
Susan, thank you for that lovely poetry on the Trinity. It inspired me to attempt to discuss the Trinity. I must say that I do not feel like this is something that I understand at all well. In fact, the more I grow in Christ, it seems that the less I feel I do understand about the mystery of the Triune God. But for what it's worth, here are some thoughts on this three-fold nature of our Lord. As Christians, we worship One God, not a pantheon as in some other religions. We believe that there is One being who made us and loves us, and who rules the universe. In Deuteronomy 6:4 it is written, "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!" (NKJV). There are not separate gods, who could have separate desires or goals, or who could disagree among themselves. Nevertheless Scripture reveals that there is a multiple nature to God, which is usually described as God being three Persons, which are the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Although the nature of the Trinity is most clearly expressed in the New Testament, there are an abundance of references to this in the Old Testament as well, beginning in Genesis 1:26, at the very beginning: "Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;'". Also, after the fall, in Genesis 3:22, "Then the Lord God said, 'Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil.'". (NKJV) In these scriptures God describes himself as plural. This is not just a 'royal' we, such as a President might use in order to appear more dignified, but a reference to His multiple nature. We can see the three members of the Trinity revealed at the time of Jesus's baptism by John in Matthew 3:16-17: "Then Jesus, when He had been baptized, came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting upon Him. And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, 'This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.'". Jesus taught about the Trinity during the Last Supper, when He promised the gift of the Holy Spirit (John 15:26): "But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me." Again, these are not three different gods, but one God. Jesus declared that He was One with the Father: "And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one." (John 17:22). The Holy Spirit was also declared to be God in Acts 5:3-4: "But Peter said, 'Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? ... You have not lied to men but to God.'". In the book of Revelation we see the Throne Room of God the Almighty in chapters 4 and 5. The Father is presented as the One who sits upon the Throne, with the Lamb (Jesus) at his side, and with the Spirit burning in seven lamps of fire before the Throne. I would like now to turn to each member of the Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and try to describe my meager understanding of the nature of each. I welcome whatever help others can give me in adding to or correcting this. The Father is the Creator of the universe. He is the One who sits upon the Throne and administers all that is. He is the source and image of holiness, and all our images of beauty and perfection flow from Him. He is unable to look upon unrighteousness, but nevertheless loves in an unimaginable flow towards all men, including those not saved. He is the Judge of all creatures, the One before whom all will have to give account on the day of Judgement for every deed that they have done, good and evil. He is also the One who forgives us our sins, because of the blood of Jesus shed on the Cross. He sees that sacrifice, and forgets our sins, for everyone who has come under that cleansing flood. Mostly, He loves us with a love as wide as the skies. He sent the Son to Earth to die for us, in His most wonderful act of love ever. The Son is Jesus Christ, born of Mary and the Holy Spirit, both fully Man and fully God. He existed with the Father before anything was created, and will be with Him at the end of all things. "I am the beginning and the end, the Alpha and the Omega." He lived in humility as a man, taught his disciples, was rejected by the religious leadership of the Jews, and was crucified on a cross for proclaiming Himself to be the Messiah, the Promised One, who was sent by the Father to bring deliverance to His people. How little they understood of Him! The deliverance Jesus brought was not just a release from Roman tyranny, but a breaking of the power of sin over people and of the power of Satan over the earth. The power of the accomplishment of Jesus on the Cross will defeat any darkness it is brought near to. Jesus is also the One who will come again to establish His kingdom here on earth, and to sweep away all evil forces in the battle of Armageddon. The Holy Spirit is also God, but is sometimes not so clearly understood as the other Persons of the Trinity. He is the active force which accomplishes the words of the Father. He is the power that worked the miracles that Jesus worked, from walking on the water to knowing intimate details of people's lives that Jesus came to. The Holy Spirit is referred to as the Comforter, the One who comes alongside us in our sorrows and hardship of life. He is called the Spirit of truth, which gives us witness in our hearts of the truth when we hear it. "But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your rememberance all things that I said to you." (John 14:26) It is the Spirit which convicts unbelievers of their sin and of their need for Jesus. Without His aid no one would ever soften their heart to accept Jesus as their Lord. The Holy Spirit is referred to as 'He', and He is definitely personal, from my experience with Him! The Holy Spirit is also an empowering force. When a Christian has been baptised with the Holy Spirit, they have been empowered by the power of the Holy Spirit to walk not like other men, but in the new life that Christ calls us to. We are empowered to confess Jesus to others, to give witness to the new life in us, to desire to know God, to surrender our lives to him in general and in particular points of obedience. With the baptism also come specific gifts of miraculous power, to heal the sick, to prophesy, and to speak in other tongues. These gifts are not given for selfish pride, but to build up and serve the other Christians in the Body. Finally, it is the Spirit who makes all Christians everywhere one. Our unity is found in that we have all received One Spirit into our heart, which binds us together in love. Much more obviously can be said for each member of the Trinity. The most prominent thing which is common to all is the complete love that He gives to us. God is the most tender, compassionate, gentle and forgiving person we can ever meet. In all of the ways He expresses Himself, that is the chief theme. Love. In Christ's name, Peter Homeier ARPANET: homeier@aerospace
purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva) (08/09/85)
I promised myself that I wasn't going to enter this discussion, but here goes... In article <326@aero.ARPA> homeier@aero.UUCP (Peter Homeier (MISD)) writes: >But for what it's worth, here are some >thoughts on this three-fold nature of our Lord. >Although the nature of the Trinity is most clearly expressed in the New >Testament, there are an abundance of references to this in the Old Testament as >well, beginning in Genesis 1:26, at the very beginning: "Then God said, 'Let >Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;'". I was taught that in this verse God is speaking to the earth. Let us (God and the earth) make man. Which is just what God did. He made man from the earth, and then breathed his spirit into him. This explanation always seemed to make more sense to me. >in Genesis 3:22, "Then the Lord God said, 'Behold, the man has become like one >of Us, to know good and evil.'". (NKJV) In these scriptures God describes >himself as plural. Again, how do you know he was refering to only himself? Remember, the angels, and Satan were created before man, and they all knew about good and evil. In short - I see no evidence for the trinity in the Old Testament. The New Testament, however, does certainly suggest that there are at least multiple facets of God, but it never uses the word trinity, or anything close. Who are we to say that there are only three, and to define them so well? I think that by trying to define God down to a level like that diminutises him. >I would like now to turn to each member of the Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy >Spirit, and try to describe my meager understanding of the nature of each. I >welcome whatever help others can give me in adding to or correcting this. [paragraph about the father, then one about Christ that ends like this:] >Jesus is also the One who will come again >to establish His kingdom here on earth, and to sweep away all evil forces in >the battle of Armageddon. The last sentence is incredibly debatable, but the only thing that I would like to discuss less than the trinity is prophesy. [Line about the Holy Spirit] Basically I think that everything that you have said is good, with only a few exceptions, which I have pointed out. My opinion is that sure, God has many different aspects to his nature, we all do. But to label them "father" "son" and "holy spirit" and to call them the trinity is what I have problems with. My advice is don't get too wrapped up in the doctrine of the trinity. Believing in it, or not believing in it, is not going to save or damn you. Although I do know people who would disagree violently with that. cheers - elizabeth g. purtell (Lady Godiva)
jah@philabs.UUCP (Julie Harazduk) (08/14/85)
>In article <326@aero.ARPA> homeier@aero.UUCP (Peter Homeier (MISD)) writes: >>Although the nature of the Trinity is most clearly expressed in the New >>Testament, there are an abundance of references to this in the Old Testament >>as well, beginning in Genesis 1:26, at the very beginning: "Then God said, >>'Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;'". > I was taught that in this verse God is speaking to the earth. Let us >(God and the earth) make man. Which is just what God did. He made man >from the earth, and then breathed his spirit into him. This explanation >always seemed to make more sense to me. I can't picture God talking to the dust before he breathed life into it. The only acceptable explanation, outside of evidence for the Trinity, that I have heard is that He was talking to the host of angels in heaven. Rashi (a renowned Jewish Old Testament commentator) suggests this possibility. But I don't believe this is true, even though it makes sense to me. > In short - I see no evidence for the trinity in the Old Testament. How about Isaiah 7:14 or Isaiah 9:6 or Psalm 110 where the Son is called God but distinctly a separate person? Especially in Psalm 110, "The Lord said to my Lord...." I think this is evidence enough. And there is numerous mention of patriarchs and prophets being filled with the Spirit of God (in some translations it is capitalized and in others it is not). If we didn't have the New Testament, then I could see explanations really varying to extremes. But now that we've been enlightened, it's hard to overlook the distinct persons of God. >>Jesus is also the One who will come again >>to establish His kingdom here on earth, and to sweep away all evil forces in >>the battle of Armageddon. > The last sentence is incredibly debatable, but the only thing that I >would like to discuss less than the trinity is prophesy. A debate on this could be fun. I think it is important to believe that Jesus is coming again, but beyond that, I don't think that it should be a doctrinal concern. It doesn't alter one's salvation any, I believe. The fact that Jesus is coming back does appear to be very important to the New Testament writer's and, especially, to Jesus Himself. So I'm sure this is not debatable. > My advice is don't get too wrapped up in > the doctrine of the trinity. Believing in it, or not believing in it, is > not going to save or damn you. Although I do know people who would > disagree violently with that. Actually, I think it is advisable to search the Scriptures and seek God on this issue. I believe the three persons of God are very much as Peter has described and that he has based his article on the Scriptures. God Bless you and Enlighten you, Julie A. Harazduk