[net.micro.mac] Response summary to "Is the Mac becoming obsolete?"

len@qumix.UUCP (Leonard Labar) (02/22/85)

Since some of you requested feedback I am posting my interpretation of
the responses to my earlier message.  First of all, about 30 or so
self-appointed watchdogs barked rather loudly at my posting directly to
fa.info-mac.  Hence the answer to that question "why two mac nets?"
became obvious.  Fa means "from arpanet".  This net was created out of
a need to express what was not getting through on fa.info-mac.  That
net is supposedly moderated now, predictions are that this one would be
also.

Secondly, it seems the current standardization on formats is binhex
version 4.  Tohex and fromhex are obsolete by default.  There is other
stuff floating around but it doesn't seem popular yet.

Thirdly, the Mac is not obsolete YET.  The latest article I read shows
both the Atari and Commodore pc's using 68000's.  The rationale for
keeping a Mac currently is that they will be 6-12 months away from
getting any decent software on the market (These opinions don't
neccessarily reflect those of my employer or myself during saner
moments).  HOWEVER, assuming one should take a gamble and decide to
keep one's Mac:  1. I would recommend doing the Jan. '85 Dr. Dobbs
upgrade to 512k for $200.  2. Getting the internal hard disk upgrade
known as turbo-mac.  3.  If the price ever drops, buying a copy of
"Jazz".  THAT should prolong its' life for another year if you can
stand to be without color.  I've heard those x-rays aren't too good on
the eyes anyway.  When someone comes out with a 32032 based machine
with decent software to run on it you can kiss all these products
goodbye.  If I were IBM I would be thinking of it.