wall@sri-unix (08/12/82)
Some of these articles get pretty heavy, so I'll keep my thoughts as simple as possible (some people even believe that to be true always). I feel that time can be thought of as slices, one following the other. If I were to walk down the street, and it took 1 minute, and then I were to go back in time that one minute, then I would be at the start of my walk. So if you could go back in time you would be exactly where you were at that time in the first pass. If that is the case, then you would be exactly as you were back then (with no idea that you just came back in time). This would be neat to relive some of those nice moments in ones life, but doing the same thing over and over? If it were possible to go back in time and still retain your thoughts (that happened some time in the future) this would enable you to do something different than you did the first time. My point is that going 'back' in time and then following a different path is not travelling the past, but mearly following a new future path from that point. Personnaly I feel that if you go back in time, you would just relive exactly what happened before, if you went back too far, then time would have to pass untill you were born and then your life would follow the same path. THOUGHTS ARE LOST AS YOU TRAVEL BACK IN TIME. (Hypothesis) Jim