[net.misc] J.J. clarification

rwg (09/09/82)

I must apologize for a recent flame. I was referring to the technical charge
That Jo Jo was convicted of (which someone here related as "carnal knowledge
of a girl under 16") and not to the actual circumstances, which seem to
imply a different charge ("carnal knowledge with someone incapable of making
a decision"?).  My earlier note certainly must have seemed strange if you
didn't realize this...