[net.misc] calendars

steward (11/13/82)

     It has been some time since  the  heyday  of  the  discussion  on
     calendars,  leap years, et al. and, during that lull in conversa-
     tion, my mind has been churning some calendrical  musings.   Now,
     to release some half-digested thoughts:

     I think it's curious that we number our days before they're past.
     Before  the  first day of the year is over, we call it January 1.
     We seem to do  the  same  with  years.   Hence,  the  once-common
     phrase,  "in  the  year  of our Lord, 1215," does not assume that
     1,215 years have past.  In addition, I have never seen  a  refer-
     ence to the year 0 nor do we have a January 0.*  However, as any-
     one who has spent the night on the computer can attest, we do as-
     sume a zero when we count hours of the day.**

     Now, to speculate, I think this (do I say illogical?)  method  of
     counting  days and years came from a period before the "West" was
     introduced to the idea of zero --  probably a period  when  Janus
     was  looking  both ways or, as someone on the net believes, back-
     wards.  When did we start counting  hours?   No  doubt,  sometime
     after zero.

     * If there was a year 0, tell me whether it was a leap year!
       Sorry, "cal" starts at year 1.

     ** Diurnal folks can try the command "leave 0".