[net.micro.mac] SUMMARY on What Scientists Want From Mac Software

benn@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (T Cox) (03/12/86)

[]
   I originally promised to only post this on net.sci, but after several
   requests to the contrary, I'm cross posting to the groups where I asked
   for responses.  Flame me if you will; it's too late now.  :-)

   These are the replies I got to the question, "What do scientists want
   in a Macintosh [or any other] scientific stat/graphing package?"

   One hopes the developers out there are awake and listening.

   Thomas Cox

-----

From: ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!fdot (Tom Lippincott)

How about error handling?  I've never seen *any* program where you could, for
example, add 1.23+/-.02 to 4.56+/-.04 and get 5.79+/-.06, let alone
perform more complicated math, graph them with error bars automatically, etc.

Also, if statistics are incorporated, make it possible to flag errors as 
"systematic" or "spastic", as the systematic errors are not affected by
averaging.

What about including units in the math, and flagging errors of mismatched
quantities (e.g., 5 meters + 3 joules) and working out the units of
mathematical results (5kg * 10 m/s = 50 kg*m/s)?  Built-in conversion tables?
Settings for relativistic units (time=space, energy=mass, &c.)?

-----

From: ihnp4!mhuxt!evans

I would like to see 3d graphs with fit surfaces

-----

From: ihnp4!mhuxl!smh
>From the keys of Steve Henning, AT&T Bell Labs, Reading, PA mhuxl!smh

On my wish list would be statistics/data handling capabilities and
the ability to do qqplots, probability plots or whatever you want to
call them.  The statistics capability should handle missing values
where appropriate.  If you are familiar with S, it has most of this
in it, but rather than having a spreadsheet, it has matrix math.
If one could could marry S to the mac along with the tools that
we know and love, it would be fantastic.

-----

From: dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois)

Standard deviation bars!

-----

From: ihnp4!tektronix!reed!bart (Bart Massey)

     The ideal package for the Mac would have about 80 windows -- a layout
(like pagemaker) window, a text entry (like macwrite) window, a graphing
window, a table window (like vax tbl), a equation typesetting window
(like vax eqn), a graphics editing window (like macdraw), would be good
starters.

Basically, one would use the various subwindows to do various parts
of a document, and then combine them all on the layout window.  Clearly
one could not emulate all the functions of each referenced program in
its respective window, but one should be able to do a reasonable subset.

The other alternative is to just do DAs that generate picts for graphing,
tables, equations, and graphics, and then use a word-processor and
the clipboard to tie them together.  This might be gobs simpler...

-----

From: ihnp4!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!cmcl2!rna!cubsvax!peters (Peter S. Shenkin)

Build in all the features of APL! 

-----

From: Philip Leverton (Postgrad, Dept. of Physics, University of Melbourne) 
	<ihnp4!seismo!munnari!murdu.oz!pal>

	I already use,quite heavily, the S statistics and graphics software
from AT&T.  I rather like the multi-functional
interface that allows you to do what you want by building up from simple
tools but still has advanced routines available. - Rather like the so-called
Unix philosophy. I doubt whether a "spreadsheet" interface has enough power
to display and manipulate arbitrarily long arrays of numbers and strings
- a function that S handles well. Its "implied vectorisation" - giving
a vector to a scalar function applies the function to every element of the
vector - is a very important attribute.
	A macro facility in which complex procedures could be constructed from
the basic commands would be very useful too - how one could marry this
with an essentially mouse oriented system would need some careful 
consideration.
	As you can see, my favourite package is S :-)

-----

   Well, that's it.  Send your additions, comments, alpha test packages (:-)
   to:

   Thomas Cox
   ...ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!benn   benn%sphinx@uchicago.bitnet

   We men speak of love and desire as though they were two seperate 
   things, but they are not.  They are two facets of the same thing.
--