[net.micro.mac] net.sources vs. net.sources.mac

bart@reed.UUCP (Bart Massey) (03/22/86)

Wake up, folks!

> In article <445@Navajo.ARPA> berner@Navajo.UUCP (William Berner) writes:
> >In article <367@unirot.UUCP> liz@unirot.UUCP (Mamaliz ) writes:
> >>
> >>PLEASE do not x-post info-mac software to net.sources!!  I (and a number
> >>of other people I know about) have a large enough problem pruning the
> >>garbage out of net.sources.  We have limited disk space around here.
> >>
> >>liz
> >
> >Is this to say that all of the stuff posted to info-mac is garbage?  Or
> >are you worried about double-postings, or what?  Certainly it seems that
> >some of the utilities posted to info-mac would be worthy of posting to 
> >net.sources.
> 
> 
> Please send it.  I am mailed INFO-MAC regularly, and am always upset that the
> software mentioned is not availiable to me.  if it were posted to net.sources
> I would have access to some very useful sounding programs.  I assume that
> there would be no double-postings.

I've seen several responses like Mr. Berner's, and I think somebody's missed
the point of the original posting -- post mac stuff to net.sources.MAC, not
plain old net.sources ...

					Bart Massey
					..tektronix!reed!bart