mark@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Mark Turner) (05/29/85)
Experlisp, Experlogo, and OPS5 for the Macintosh are announced in the June 1985 issue of Scientific American. I would appreciate reviews from anyone who has used them. ...ihnp4!gargoyle!puck!mark
dsouza@waltz (07/10/85)
Has anyone used the new ExperLisp for the Mac? I remember seeing such a question a few months ago, but no responses. If anyone has seen/used this product, I'd be interested in what you think of it. Also, any suggestions on where I can get it at a discount price? Thanx for any info, Dilip D'Souza. Texas Instruments, Austin. dsouza@ti-csl (CSNet) dsouza%ti-csl@csnet-relay (ARPANet). (512) 250-4298.
verber@osu-eddie.UUCP (Mark Verber) (07/12/85)
> > Has anyone used the new ExperLisp for the Mac? I remember seeing such > a question a few months ago, but no responses. If anyone has seen/used > this product, I'd be interested in what you think of it. Also, any > suggestions on where I can get it at a discount price? I have played with ExperLisp a bit. I would suggest you stay as far away from the product as you can. First of all, it is rather buggy. This might change in the next releases but I was not impressed. Secondly, all they released is a compiler, no interpreter. The compiler is slow, and does not produce double-clickable images. Many of these problems many be fixxed, I am waiting to see. Another problem is the lisp dialect itself. They seems to be trying to create a CommonLisp compiler, but don't seem to be supporting closures. This means that this compiler will be more like MacLisp (excuse the pun, from Dec-20 land), with CommonLisp function names, than CommonLisp. Finally it doesn't thrill me that ExperLisp has a list price of $500, and the cheapest discount price I have seen is $289 (Programs Plus, 800-832-3201). This was listed in this month's MacWorld page 102. There are two lisp systems I would suggest you looking into. The first is Utah's PSL (Portable Standard Lisp). PSL is a very nice dialect of Lisp that has been under development at Utah for a number of years. They currently have only a small subset of the interpreter done (It will run on a 128K Mac though). There are plans for bringing up the full PSL compiler and interpreter. Secondly a company called Semantic MicroSystems is going to be marketting a version of Scheme (which conforms to the 1985 Revised Revised Report). This version of Scheme was written by Willian Clinger, the editor of the Revised Revised Report on Scheme. This should be a very nice product. It is rather fast. Scheme for those of you who don't know is a lexical-scoped lisp that was developped by Guy Steele and Jerry Sussman at MIT for instruction. They designed a langauge that was simple, consistant, and very powerful. Cheers, Mark Verber, Ohio State University uucp: {ihnp4,cbosgd}!osu-eddie!verber inet: verber@rutgers.edu csnet: verber@ohio-state
al@vger.UUCP ( Informatix) (06/14/86)
Has anyone out there benchmarked ExperLisp? Particularly in relation to Aztec C? I'm interested in integer arithmetic, pointer manipulation, function calls, etc. I don't much care about disk access, compilation speed, or floating point. Even subjective impressions of speed would be helpful. Thanx in advance.