t-jacobs@utah-cs.UUCP (Tony Jacobs) (06/25/86)
The last batch of patches that were relayed from Think seem to conflict with
an earlier set of patches that covered the first three patches of recient post.
the patch: 197C 0004 0001 196D
to: 197C 0004 FFE5 196D
was prieviously posted as:296D for the last four numbers. These are
findable, but '196D' isn't.
Is it a mistype on the latest post?weber@brand.UUCP (Allan G. Weber) (07/01/86)
> The last batch of patches that were relayed from Think seem to conflict with > an earlier set of patches that covered the first three patches of recient post. > > the patch: 197C 0004 0001 196D > to: 197C 0004 FFE5 196D > > was prieviously posted as:296D for the last four numbers. These are > findable, but '196D' isn't. > > Is it a mistype on the latest post? You're right, the patch was typed incorrectly. It should be: Change: 197C 0004 0001 296D to: 197C 0004 FFE5 296D Sorry about that. Allan Weber Weber%Brand@USC-ECL.ARPA ...sdcrdcf!usc-oberon!brand!weber