allison@convexs.UUCP (09/22/86)
I've got a question for all you mac-types: how easy is it to get a maca mac to work with multiple modems simultaneously? For example, suppose you wanted to run a simple bulletin board off of a mac with 4 phone lines. Since there are only two serial ports, you'd obviously need some hardware doo-dad that would allow you to connect more than one device to your serial port. Does something like this exist? If so, what is the cost? The other question is this: is a mac really suited for an application like this, or would I be better off with something else? Any input would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!!! Brian Allison {allegra, ihnp4, uiucdcs, ctvax}!convex!allison Convex Computer Corp. Richardson, TX
bezanson@gumby.WISC.EDU (Brian Bezanson) (09/24/86)
In article <27000020@convexs>, allison@convexs.UUCP writes: > > I've got a question for all you mac-types: how easy is it to get a maca mac > to work with multiple modems simultaneously? For example, suppose you > wanted to run a simple bulletin board off of a mac with 4 phone lines. > Since there are only two serial ports, you'd obviously need some hardware > doo-dad that would allow you to connect more than one device to your serial > port. Does something like this exist? If so, what is the cost? > > The other question is this: is a mac really suited for an application like > this, or would I be better off with something else? Any input would be > much appreciated. Thanks in advance!!! Brian, Having run a Mac BBS for 8 months, I have found that without any great advances in general BBS software (reference to Scott Watson's Red Ryder Host system, a mac is rather wasted as a BBS since it is only doing a simple operation (BBS's aren't that machine dependant - if at all). The big promise of the Mac BBS was that one day we would see a Mac'ish interface on both ends. That hasn't appeared yet, so there is no big Mac advantage. You could write your own software for two lines on the mac (correct me if I am wrong on this - I know you will anyway). It is more beneficial (financially) to run a multi-line BBS off of an Apple // or cheap PC clone. Both have been out long enough to see some decent software appear, and they have slots for plenty of modems (the // line has a 6-line conferencing system available for it. The mac has a lot more power than to be dedicated to running a BBS. If it was complex enough to merit the macs hardware, then I could see running it with a mac. The MouseHole is a major mac BBS and it is running 2-psuedo lines (one for messages and one for downloads). Last time I called the message system was running on an Apple //+ and the downloa section on a TRS80-III. I ran my BBS off of my MacXL that I originally had. I left it on all night anyway, so why not make it useful. Hope that helps in your decision. Of course all this will probably be altered at the January San Francisco Apple MacWorld, when the new Mac should be introduced. Brian Bezanson MCI Mail: MANTA Manta Software Corporation CompuServe: 72356,475 bezanson@gumby.wisc.edu -- Brian Bezanson {seismo,ihnp4,allegra,topaz,harvard}!uwvax!puff!bezanson Manta Software Corp. " " " " " !gumby!bezanson bezanson@gumby.wisc.edu bezanson@puff.wisc.edu