gj@bubba.UUCP (09/24/85)
Is the sense of the '-k' and '-f' flags in 'rman' reversed with respect
to 'man' or am I missing something?
--
George Jenkins, COSI Texas, Inc., 4412 Spicewood Springs #801, Austin TX
78759 USA
uucp: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!cositex!bubba!gj
at&t: (512) 345-2780broome@ucbvax.ARPA (Jonathan C. Broome) (09/27/85)
In article <150@bubba.UUCP> gj@bubba.UUCP writes: >Is the sense of the '-k' and '-f' flags in 'rman' reversed with respect >to 'man' or am I missing something? They're right as far as I can tell, at least compared to the standard Berkeley 'man'. The '-f ' flag in man is the same as 'apropos', and the '-k' is the same as 'whatis'. If you get these confused, just use the '-a' and '-w' flags to rman, they're easier to remember (that's why I added them). =========================================================== Jonathan C. Broome University of California, Berkeley UUCP ...!ucbvax!broome ARPA broome@ucbvax.ARPA ===========================================================
broome@ucbvax.ARPA (Jonathan C. Broome) (09/28/85)
Oops, I goofed. Yes, the flags are indeed transposed compared to the standard man. And I even checked to make sure I was right. Turns out I checked on a machine with "rman" installed as ucb/man. Time to send out a "cancel" message... --- Jonathan Broome