"forwarded@randvax.UUCP (11/04/85)
Gaston Gonnet's recent article on SMP reminds me that a
group (self/ ffitch/ Padget) at Bath wrote to CACM on 30th.
June complaining about that article, and enclosing a reply
for the ACM Forum. Unfortunately, CACM lost that letter.
I now have a letter from Ashenhurst (the Forum editor)
dated the 14th. October, saying "We will probably wish to
publish it, along with one other letter received".
Unfortunately, Ashenhurst finds that 100^3-100*100*100
is "somewhat overly technically detailed".
We share Gonnet's regret that this article was
published.
J.H. Davenport
Due to a recent massive fowarding failure this article is being reposted.
Larry Seward (lseward@rand-unix.arpa)
Received: from serc-icf.engineering.cambridge.ac.uk by 44d.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
via Janet with NIFTP id a001155; 30 Oct 85 13:08 GMT
Date: Wednesday, 30 October 1985 12:32:56