[net.misc] DDT or no DDT

jonw (04/18/83)

>From a recent article entitled, Re: re: baby formula:

      	"Don't assume that because something is banned in the USA that
   it is immoral or dangerous for manufacturers to export it to other
   countries....  
   	It comes down to self-determinism :  other people should have the
   right to choose DDT or no DDT".  


I think that DDT is an exceedingly poor example to illustrate the above point.
The developed nations have a moral obligation not to compound past mistakes by
exporting dangerous technologies to developing nations.  DDT and the other
chlorinated hydrocarbons should not be produced or used anywhere in the world;
they do far more harm to man and other vertebrates than they do to insects.

Remember that we are all in this together.  The pollution problems of
developing nations are our problems as well.

						Jon White
						Tektronix
						Aloha, Ore.

halle1 (04/29/83)

And don't forget that piece of net.tv.trivia:
Dumb Martians Just Sit Nearby Eating Tender Noodles.
David, Mary, Joanie, Susan, Nancy, Elizabeth, Tommy, Nicholas.
(The kids on Eight is Enough.)