tower@inmet.UUCP (01/21/86)
Does anyone have a reasonable estimate of the surface gravity of Pluto? It would be most useful relative to Earth = 1.0. Any reasonable estimate would be greatly appreciated. Len Tower UUCP: {bellcore,ima,ihnp4}!inmet!tower INTERNET: ima!inmet!tower@CCA-UNIX.ARPA
throopw@dg_rtp.UUCP (01/27/86)
> Does anyone have a reasonable estimate of the surface gravity of Pluto? > > It would be most useful relative to Earth = 1.0. I always get my estimates from The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. So, looking in the index under "Pluto", I find "Pluto, physical data for". Page F150 yields a column for "Gravity(cm/sec**2)", and Pluto has a mean value of 221.0 (+- 207.0) (it also gives polar and equatorial values, but you probably don't care) [not too damn accurate, is it? ah well, pressing on] while Earth has a mean value of 980.7 (+- .9), so the ratio is .225 or so. Say "Pluto has about a fifth Earth gravity", and you won't go any further wrong than the usual estimates. (I suspect that more recent books should have more accurate estimates... you might check out your nearby friendly college library for the latest edition of the HofC&P (mine is 52nd edition)) (I put this information here rather than mailing to let net.sci readers with similar problems know about the HofC&P. It is a goldmine of such useless trivia.) > Len Tower {bellcore,ima,ihnp4}!inmet!tower -- Wayne Throop at Data General, RTP, NC <the-known-world>!mcnc!rti-sel!dg_rtp!throopw
msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) (01/29/86)
To the question: > > Does anyone have a reasonable estimate of the surface gravity of Pluto? > > It would be most useful relative to Earth = 1.0. Wayne Throop replies with a plug ... > I always get my estimates from The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. > ... Pluto has a mean value of 221.0 (+- 207.0) [cm/sec**2] > ... not too damn accurate, is it? > ...so the ratio is .225 or so. Note that huge uncertainty. The reason is that until recently the mass of Pluto, and hence the surface gravity, was very much unknown. Wayne did say: > (I suspect that more recent books should have more accurate estimates... > you might check out your nearby friendly college library for the latest > edition of the HofC&P (mine is 52nd edition)) Well, I'm putting this here to remind people not to neglect the World Almanac. To cite one more instance, you can find the orbital elements of the planets in there, and they aren't in my Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia (6th edition)/y. What follows is the letter I mailed to the original poster, which, in view of the above, I have decided is worth posting to the net after all. The last sentence is not from the almanac, but follows from Newton's law of gravitation. To: utzoo!ihnp4!inmet!tower Subject: Pluto surface gravity? This one is found, appropriately, in the World Almanac. Page 728 of my 1985 edition gives Pluto's surface gravity as 0.04 of Earth's. This is fairly reliable since it is derived from measurements made since Pluto's satellite Charon was discovered: planet diameter 1,860 miles, mass 0.0025 of Earth's. Surface gravity is proportional to m/r^2 (planet mass over square of planet radius). Mark Brader