eugene@ames.UUCP (05/23/86)
< L o o k ! N o 4 6 l i n e s o f p r e v i o u s j u n k ! >
Please people! Edit inappropriate newsgroups out of follow ups.
We passed the science content of the Pu discussion after the Cf
data posting. Nuclear hand grenades contain no new science, just old.
You can edit net.sci back in when you have something useful to add.
Also, I do not see any science in the Psi discussion either. You people
spend your time proving the existence of XXX, but nothing else. The
psi people have to go into an operational research (not OR) mode
(like SRI? ;-) ). What is driving a lot of science these days is
economics (for better or worse). If Psi is more than a curiosity,
then let the money roll in. You can at least strive to do as well
as the Freudians. ;-)
From the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
--eugene miya
NASA Ames Research Center
com'on do you trust Reply commands with all these different mailers?
{hplabs,ihnp4,dual,hao,decwrl,tektronix,allegra}!ames!aurora!eugene
eugene@ames-aurora.ARPA