ss@wivax.UUCP (Sid Shapiro) (07/27/83)
We would like to conduct a poll on a minor point of the user interface to the ucb/mail program. Scenario: Mail is sent to a system-wide alias. A person (hereafter known as the "replier" uses the "r" command to reply to the message. The header of the reply message contains a "To" field with the name of the originator of the original message (the one being replied to) and also the alias. In other words - the reply goes to the originator AND the all folks who got the original message. Question: Is that reasonable behavior? Not from a system, or naive-user, or even experience-user standpoint, but from a mail-system-design standpoint. The results will be posted. (And maybe the software changed!) Thanks, folks Sid Shapiro -- {decvax,linus}!wivax!ss -- Wang Institute ss.Wang-Inst@UDel-Relay -- (617)649-9731 -- Sid Shapiro -- {decvax,linus}!wivax!ss -- Wang Institute ss.Wang-Inst@UDel-Relay -- (617)649-9731
thomson@utcsrgv.UUCP (07/28/83)
Having 'r' send mail back to the originator and to all other original recipients is fine, since that's exactly what you asked it to do. If you want it to go only to the originator, use 'R'. Well, maybe not so fine ... perhaps the two functions should be interchanged. -- Brian Thomson, CSRG Univ. of Toronto {linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd,utzoo}!utcsrgv!thomson
alle@ihuxb.UUCP (07/28/83)
If you use 'R' rather than 'r', then a reply is sent to the sender only. Now maybe the two commands should be reversed, but the feature exists and having both features does rather make sense. Allen England
jcz@ncsu.UUCP (08/03/83)
References: wivax.18470 use 'R' instead of 'r', and see what happens. --jcz