info-mac@utcsrgv.UUCP (info-mac) (07/09/84)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 84 13:40:49 edt From: uw-beaver!mark@harvard.ARPA (Mark Lentczner) To: CMP.WERNER@UTEXAS-20.ARPA, info-mac@UTEXAS-20.ARPA Subject: MAC as a closed system (micro-flame) Cc: pourne@MIT-MC.ARPA I agree that the MAC is, to some extent a closed system. Sorry, Dan Winkler, just having 3000+ pages of documentation doesn't make a system open. Those pages may tell you how things are done, but those things are not nessicarilly done in the most flexible way. The MAC provides a very rich environment in which to program, but that environment is very fixed with respect to the way that things are to be done in it. By forcing the interface to such rigidity Apple closed off other ways of doing things as well as fixes to things that were done differently than we would like. In general I say bravo to the MAC, but it isn't the most flexible of environments. There are alot of things that go on inside there. And they all function well, IF you use them and think about them in the ways Apple does. But, if you look at things in a different way, then the system closes up. It is a closed system 'cause it makes you design & program in the way Apple thought to do it... -mark lentczner electronic music studio music department harvard university cambridge, ma 02138 lentczner@harvard {allegra,genrad,ihnp4,ima,ucbvax}!harvard!lentczner