[net.music.classical] re -- "note-perfect" performances

parker@psuvax.UUCP (Bruce Parker) (05/01/84)

Yes, there more "note-perfect" concerts these days.  This should not
be too surprising.  I don't think it has much to do with comparisons
of recordings, although the reviewers in most audio journals seem
to be concerned almost solely with the sound rather than the music.
It seems to have more to do with some the following:

	(1)  Greater financial security of the performers;
	     this gives you better performers, but

	(2)  Conductors do not wield the dictatorial control they
	     once did.  This is fine by most musicians, though it's
	     a bit late to offer any solice to those emotionally crushed
	     or physically abused by conductors (e.g. the fellow from
	     the Pittsburgh under Reiner who committed suicide or
	     the string player who had his eye accidently gauged out
	     by Toscanini.)  As a result conductors must inspire
	     rather than cajole their orchestras.

	(3)  The orchestra schedules have been enlarged -- more
	     performances, fewer rehearsals.  Even with conductors
	     with sufficient inspiration, how many days a week
	     can one go on emoting in top form before dropping
	     like a race horse?  Let's get serious, people:
	     Musicians are people -- they are allowed to get bored
	     and tired.

Personally, there have been very few performances, either live or
recorded, that I would say are unforgettable.  That is life.
Most conductors are not very good.  Most singers are not very good.
Most orchestras are not very good.  Only under rare circumstances
does anything wonderful take place.