janzen@sunfun.DEC (Thomas E. Janzen CSS GNG CWO 714 850-7849 SUNFUN::JANZEN) (08/15/84)
Categories of Appeal in Music Thomas E. Janzen 14 August 1984 2300 Fairview Road, H-201 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Music is the least universal of languages. A nation is likely to speak in no more than two tongues, but is likely to listen to a great many musical idioms. Also, few listeners enjoy and sponsor more than one idiom of music. In such diversity of artistic expression as this, can criteria for evaluation of music be established? Would it be desirable to do so? In order to guide young composers in the development of a personal standard of excellence, it is helpful to teach them a coherent set of criteria for judging music. Whether composers play their music on a kazoo while pacing pavement, or build tape recordings of sounds, criteria aid composers at all stages of their careers in choosing materials and techniques. Criteria of excellence in music are not required by non-musicians. Music critics do not write criticism; they are feature writers published in entertainment sections of newspapers to provide just that - entertainment. Critics are not musical participants and do not need musical criteria. Listeners do not need a set of criteria for listening. Criteria of evaluation are a basis of action, but a listener can take no meaningful action. A judgment about a piece of music can take place only after an audition, and by then it is to late. There is no question of deciding to audition a work a second time. There is perhaps much more music being written than there is time to listen. A South African researcher reports having documented eight-thousand women composers of concert music. If we freely extrapolate two or three male composers to one female, there may be as many as 24,000 to 32,000 composers of concert music in the world, alive today. There is too much music to permit listening to the same thing twice. So, listeners can take no action and need no criteria. Performers, however, do require criteria for choosing works to perform. Although the most interesting composers at present perform their own works (on tape, on computers, as solo recitalists, or by conducting their own ensembles), there remain many works of less self-sufficient individuals who depend on performers choosing their works. Having established the need by musicians for criteria of judgment for music, they are here outlined. This list may not be exhaustive. Other categories may be useful. However, a musical work is rich and enriching to the degree that it makes a variety of these appeals, rather than depending on one or a few. Aesthetic Elements in Music 1 : Convention Convention is a framework of familiarity. Expectations based on previous listening experience are cajoled into surprise or disappointment. Poly-idiomaticism juxtaposes idioms producing surprise, and the synergistic result of producing new expressions by combining expressions of different origins. Purity of idiom makes its own world, and will usually be co-opted elsewhere when it is combined with other musical sources. No music is without precedent,and no music is without convention. 2 : Mathematics The traditional contrapuntal manipulations of a motif represent a permutational logic that has been studied as such, and that flourished briefly in this century as serialism. The symbols of linguistic syntax and transformational grammar also have been used by composers, notably in computer composition. The stochastic music of Iannis Xenakis is well known. It is built with models of statistical mathematics. Many composers have been documented as using the golden mean as a ratio of partition of musical time, including Bartok, Cage, Debussy, and Bach. 3 : Formal Congruences Formal congruences occur in music when relationships in sound resemble relationships in the world. This "world" may be cognitive or perceptual or both. This type of congruence is usually expressed in form. Recognized patterns with which music imitates life include repetition, growth, and adversary relationships (some concerti). 4 : Kinesthetic/Motor Responses Involuntary reactions to rhythm, beat are experienced by every listener. The impulse to dance when one hears strong, pulsing music is common. Irregular rhythms have their own nervous effect. Subtle, less accented, rhythms have a more mild effect. 5 : Aural Symbols Aural symbols appeal to aural archetypes. More research is needed. (cf. the works of Carl Jung). We can guess at some possibilities. Some directly musical symbolic appeals may appear in sounds resembling: buzzing bees, squealing of slaughtered pigs, an infant's wail, breaking glass (this may entail a kinesthetic appeal more than archetypal) a hound's howl, cries, barks, squeals, the harmonic series (a mandala symbol?). Other symbolic appeals are not directly musical. These include: the apparent use of numerology by Bach, Crumb, and others, symbolic notation, especially by Crumb. Are there symbolic forms? 6 : Literal Congruences Literal congruences with the perceptual world are simply imitations of sounds in the world. They include onomatopoeia, and the imitation of bird calls in Vivaldi, Beethoven, Messiean. The voice is its own imitator. Tape music employing recorded sounds from the wider world depend on the same appeal that photographs do, the recognition of something familiar in the artist's creation, sometimes more obscure or more clear. In Satie's Parade, special percussion instruments mimic ordinary sounds. 7 : Illusions of the Ear Two Scientific American articles on this subject explore errors made by auditors. Oboes change tone-color to suggest a change in dynamic of which they are incapable. Such illusions must be taken into account in the effect of the music. 8 : Euphony The appeal of euphonious sounds depends on what the individual auditor regards as pretty sound. Harold Budd uses chords that, now charmingly disarming, would have grated on the ears of people living in Europe a hundred years ago as piercing dissonances awaiting resolution. Nevertheless, music often depends heavily on being pleasant to the ear. 9 : Synesthesics When listeners allow music to suggest sensations from sense organs other than the ear, they permit a synesthesic appeal to obtain. What does a sound taste like, or how does a dissonance feel? Is this a basic appeal that a composer can intend? Each of the above has subsets in other elements, but each has an exclusive subset. Values in Western music 1. Intellectual challenge, and the carrying of ideas are basic to Western music. I am an intellectualist; I believe good music's most important content is in its ideas, ideas expressible without music. I use music to express them because I like music, and am talented for it. Other people use words or paint. 2. Music may be in a familiar and conventional framework, but not so familiar as to lack challenge and surprise. 3. The use of symbols should serve the expression of the ideas of the work. 4. Literal imitation of sounds from the world at large should be kept at a minimum (except in vocal music's imitation of the human voice) and always serve an expressive purpose beyond the imitation itself. 5. Illusion should serve the expression of ideas. 6. Relationships in the world appear reflected in the work. Yes, art should imitate life. Although it is impossible to make a work that is random, because the auditor will put order into what they hear, the imitation of life should be in the control of the artist, and not allowed to please itself. 7. Motor stimulation is useful in a work, but only if serves the expression. 8. Virtuosity seems to be at times desired in music, and other times eschewed. Performance is anti-virtuosic, but Western music usually encourages virtuosity, whether of the use of an instrument, or the playing of rhythms, for example. These, then are the proposed elements of aesthetic appeal in music, which seem well-represented in successful works. They are what auditors respond to. They are categories with reference to the auditor, rather than the physical nature of sound. The question for the composer is always, "what will be heard when my piece is played," not "what is the mean frequency of the oboe in next six seconds?" With these reminders, then, composers should above all express their own ideas, their own reactions to the world, as richly as possible. Thomas E. Janzen Warren, Richard M., Warren, Roslyn P. Auditory Illusions and Confusions Scientific American. P. 30 Deutsch, Diana. Musical Illusions. Scientific American. P. 92 Patterson, Blake. Musical Dynamics. Scientific American. P. 78 Holtzman, S. R. Using Generative Grammars for Music Composition. M.I.T. Computer Music Journal. 5:1, Spring '81, p. 51. Xenakis, Iannis. Formalized Music. Indiana University Press. 1971. Cooper, Meyer. The Rhythmic Structure of Music. University of Chicago. 1960. Wed 15-Aug-1984 09:44 PDT