peter@yetti.UUCP (Runge) (10/26/85)
This news group has been interesting and educational for me, but sad to
say, it's no longer on the "approved" list in our part of the world --
the gates are going up, the shutters are coming down. Soon we will be huddled
in our chilly Canadian isolation, wondering what the SF Opera is doing this
year? what do people really like about Mahler? how expensive IS a
Boesendoerfer? and no net.music.classical to turn to for answers and further
questions. Those of you fortunate enough to live in a part of Netland where
newsgroups can flourish uncensored by system administrators, cherish
your freedom and "illegitmus non carborandum!"
--
Peter H. Roosen-Runge, Department of Computer Science, York University
Toronto M3J 1P3 , Ontario, Canada
_____________________________________________________________________________
From a land where Lord Spencer rules -- No Admittance
to Undesirable Newsgroups.
_____________________________________________________________________________abc@brl-sem.ARPA (Brint Cooper ) (10/27/85)
In article <268@yetti.UUCP> peter@yetti.UUCP (Runge) writes: >This news group has been interesting and educational for me, but sad to >say, it's no longer on the "approved" list in our part of the world -- >the gates are going up, the shutters are coming down. Is anyone trying to organize a "newsletter" or a "mailing list" for readers of net.music.classical? If a central person agreed to create a digest, thereby controlling the quantity of characters mailed and the relevance of the list, we could continue our sharing and discussions via electronic mail and all the gatewayed nets of the world. Brint
rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (11/02/85)
>>This news group has been interesting and educational for me, but sad to >>say, it's no longer on the "approved" list in our part of the world -- >>the gates are going up, the shutters are coming down. > Is anyone trying to organize a "newsletter" or a "mailing > list" for readers of net.music.classical? If a central person > agreed to create a digest, thereby controlling the quantity of > characters mailed and the relevance of the list, we could > continue our sharing and discussions via electronic mail and > all the gatewayed nets of the world. There IS a forum for doing just that. It's called net.music. Recently people there have been discussing 20th century music preferences (like Berg and Glass). ("Naah, that would be creeping socialism...") -- "Meanwhile, I was still thinking..." Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr
abc@brl-sem.ARPA (Brint Cooper ) (11/05/85)
In article <2010@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes: >>>This news group has been interesting and educational for me, but sad to >>>say, it's no longer on the "approved" list in our part of the world -- >>>the gates are going up, the shutters are coming down. >> Is anyone trying to organize a "newsletter" or a "mailing >> list" for readers of net.music.classical? > >There IS a forum for doing just that. It's called net.music. Recently >people there have been discussing 20th century music preferences (like >Berg and Glass). > If net.music.classical is no longer "approved" then net.music probably will meet the same fate. I was wondering about someting distributed by mail from a central site to specific users with addresses "user@host.domain;" for example, an Arpanet or CSNET distribution. B