garret@oddjob.UChicago.UUCP (Trisha O Tuama) (07/31/84)
***** > Greetings: > I believe that Stonehenge has very little to do with the Celtic > subset of natural languages, and much to do with general science, > and several other newsgroups. I can't agree that discussion of > Stonehenge belongs only in net.nlang.celts, as you claim. I for > one, have enjoyed the info on Stonehenge, and feel that it least > belongs in net.nlang.celts. Greetings to you, too, Sunny Kirsten of Sun Microsystems, Frankly I don't give a shit whether or not Stonehenge has anything to to with the "Celtic subset of natural languages." My point is that instead of posting 100+ line articles to six or seven newsgroups, those participating should actually post to at least 20 groups -- I mean really, undoubtedly the people at Stonehenge were concerned with eating and food preparation, and yet all those Stonehenge articles didn't get posted to net.cooks. I'll bet those early folks could have used some investment advice, and yet, once again, we find the Stonehenge writers were so inconsiderate as not to post their articles to net.invest. And you must admit those Stonehenge articles had particular relevance for net.rec.nude, net.pets, and especially net.motss. Trisha the Celtic Soul Sister