[net.origins] No religion?????

ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward) (08/31/84)

[]
>As far as your diatribe on religion: you brought it up, not me.
>I thought that it was agreed a while ago that it should be
>left out of the discussion.  In fact, I was the one that
>asked whether this should be so, because it has often happened
>to me that the person on the other side of the question brings
>up religion, claims that my arguments are all religious and
>therefore to be discarded, when I haven't even suggested it
>as a basis for making a conclusion.  

Is he kidding?  *WHO* agreed that religion should be left out
of this discussion?  The whole point of this discussion is whether
religion should be taught as science in schools.  If it were
not for this very real threat, the oxymoron known as creationist
science (or whatever they want to call it) would be worth a chuckle
or two, and nothing more.

How many creationists are there who are atheists?  Or Hindus?

Who do they think they're kidding?

Why are religious people so comfortable lying through their teeth?


-- 
Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307