daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader) (12/06/84)
> This stuff is purely religious. Get it out of here. Go to net.religion > if you want to discuss it, please. Isn't the origin of life given in Genisis purely religious? Why would a comparison of creationist teaching to the dark ages be considered purely religious? If that comparison is purely religious then doesn't it follow that creationism would also be purely religious? You must post articles for one of the following reasons: A) Just a joke to see how many people will take your foolish comments seriously. B) You belong to Satanic cult and are trying to discredit all Christians by posting ridiculous articles. C) I have been unfair because you are really mentally deficient and can't help it.
dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois) (12/13/84)
>> [Paul DuBois] >> This stuff is purely religious. Get it out of here. Go to net.religion >> if you want to discuss it, please. > [David Fader] > Isn't the origin of life given in Genisis purely religious? > Why would a comparison of creationist teaching to the dark ages > be considered purely religious? > If that comparison is purely religious then doesn't it > follow that creationism would also be purely religious? Consideration of Genesis in this newsgroup tends to be rather minimal. The reason is that a number of us consider it outside of the scope of the discussion. > You must post articles for one of the following reasons: > > A) Just a joke to see how many people will take > your foolish comments seriously. Some of the readers in this newsgroup do, occasionally. > > B) You belong to Satanic cult and are trying to discredit > all Christians by posting ridiculous articles. I don't. > C) I have been unfair because you are really mentally > deficient and can't help it. Always a real possibility! -- Paul DuBois {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois "I will sing unto the Lord as long as I live: I will sing praise to my God while I have my being." Psalm 104:33