[net.origins] flood and Bible

larryg@teklds.UUCP (12/28/84)

Marcel gets into a discussion of the Bible.  I guess he is trying to
fit it into todays thinking.  

What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended
to be.  According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of
God.  That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books.
Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean
we are right and He is wrong.  Perspective is a powerful thing.

karen alias larryg

ran@ho95b.UUCP (RANeinast) (01/04/85)

>Marcel gets into a discussion of the Bible.  I guess he is trying to
>fit it into todays thinking.  
>
>What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended
>to be.  According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of
>God.  That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books.
>Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean
>we are right and He is wrong.  Perspective is a powerful thing.
>
>karen alias larryg


This posting is the literal word of God, and I created the universe
in a Big Bang and let it evolve.

There, this writing is now also set apart from all other writings
or books (because, by according to this writing itself, it is the
literal word of God).  Just because I don't fit into YOUR way of
thinking doesn't mean you are right and I am wrong.

Same "logic" as karen.

God
(as transmitted by),
-- 

". . . and shun the frumious Bandersnatch."
       Robert Neinast (ihnp4!ho95b!ran)
       AT&T-Bell Labs

rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (01/05/85)

> Marcel gets into a discussion of the Bible.  I guess he is trying to
> fit it into todays thinking.  
> What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended
> to be.  According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of
> God.  That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books.
> Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean
> we are right and He is wrong.  Perspective is a powerful thing.
> [karen alias larryg]

According to the Book of Ubizmo itself, it is the holy unswerving and
hopelessly accurate and correct "literal" word of Ubizmo, the most holy
god of shoe polish and wax museums, AND that those who say otherwise are
wrong.  There!  That's even clearer than the Bible.  Not only does MY book
claim to be the only real truth, it also tells me that YOU are a liar for
proclaiming otherwise.  (And it predicts that you would do so---a prophecy
come true!!!  Absolute proof of the accuracy of the Book of Ubizmo.)

This belongs in some other newsgroup, but I don't know what they're calling it
this week.
-- 
When you're omniscient, everything's a tautology.      Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr

mfs@mhuxr.UUCP (SIMON) (01/08/85)

> What I am wondering is how do you know what the Bible was intended
> to be.  According to the Bible itself, it is the "literal" word of
> God.  That is what sets it apart from all other writings or books.
> Just because God doesn't fit into our way of thinking doesn't mean
> we are right and He is wrong.  Perspective is a powerful thing.
> 
> karen alias larryg

Then in that case we should all learn Aramaic or whatever the written
language of 4000 BC was. There seems to be this interesting idea that
the King James version of the Bible, a translation with considerable
poetic license of the Vulgate, which was a Latin translation of the
Greek texts, which were themselves written records of the oral tradition and
original Aramaic texts. So much for the "literal word of God"
(unless you believe that all the translators and copists were only taking
divine dictation :-)

Marcel Simon