[net.origins] Ron Kukuk's list - where did it come from?

cb@hlwpc.UUCP (Carl Blesch) (04/16/85)

Ron Kukuk:
> Several of you have asked for specific evidences that support creation
> and oppose evolution. There are many. We will list 116.
. . .
> THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE

Keith Doyle:
>Sigh.  This is not evidence for creation, and is not even evidence against
>evolution, as such observations to not constitute any kind of proof, or
>'laws'.  Again we see little more than parroting of the old claims.  Where
>did you copy this from?

Me:
I was rummaging through some old files and I found Mr. Kukuk's list.
I got it as a handout at a noon-hour lecture on creation science I
attended a few years ago.  The lecture was sponsored by the Bible Club at
AT&T Bell Laboratories.  The author of the paper Mr. Kukuk is posting,
and the guest lecturer at the Bible Club presentation, was Dr. Walter
Brown, director of the Institute for Creation Research's Midwest Office.
(By the way, I believe the "Dr." is a doctorate in Mechanical Engineering.)
I assume Mr. Brown hands this mimeographed paper out wherever he
lectures.  Ron, am I right?

Carl Blesch