hua@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Ernest Hua) (04/18/85)
___________________________________________________________________________ > { From: arndt@lymph.DEC } > > You object to my piece about the growth on my hip. Tisk, tisk. > > "Silly, inane, irrelevant . . ." you called it. Maybe so, Maybe so. > > But then a few postings later I read YOU in reply to Lew Mammel,Jr re. > the .44 mag posting saying in effect "what's wrong with comments in jest?". > > Well, which is it? Is it ok to jest or jest ok for you to do so????? > > Evolutionist twit! Listen up, simpleton: The .44 automag post (if you did not read the post, and chose to read only the replies) was a response to another post. Your posts, on the other hand, are originals. You chose to bring the discussion to your inane level; I only responded in appropriate context, which no one bothered with as they responded to my response. > You say to Lew, "As for you, I hope you know when to take things lightly. > Your comments surprise me." "Please . . . let's not get a bit carried > away while reading some obviously unserious comments." > > Need I go on???? You shouldn't. You have already spoken your foolishness enough. > Look. The evolutionists have a field day laughing about the silly (some ARE) > statements of some creationists. Why can't we laugh at silly statements made > by some evolutionists???? And you have the nerve to accuse Lew of double > standards!!!!! I didn't say shut someone up or shoot them. You did! (refer to the above comments.) > You sound like a crank boy! ^^^^^^^^^ Please define this in terms of first order properties. :-) > Regards, > > Ken Arndt > > PS Stay out of the funny cookies in the hollow tree! Don't make fun of my cookies! ___________________________________________________________________________ Live long and prosper. Keebler { hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.arpa }