cb@hlwpc.UUCP (Carl Blesch) (05/08/85)
>>> Creation science >>> is the scientific evidence for a creation, not a creator. >> >>Even if we accept that one can scientifically discuss a creation >>without talking about the creator, there is no creation science. I posed the following question to Walt Brown (director of ICR Midwest and the author of the 100+ reasons for Creationism as posted by Ron Kukuk): If creation science is truly an objective science, why don't any scientists who are non-theistic support it? His answer was that if you studied creation science, you would have to come to the realization that there is a creator. Seems to contradict the first statement above. Carl Blesch