hua@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Ernest Hua) (05/09/85)
___________________________________________________________________________ > { From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich) } > > > { an accusation that there is no evidence of creation. } > > It has been demonstrated that Evolution science is nothing but > contradictions! Since you have tactfully avoided the original accusation, you have merely confirmed it. Interestingly, you do not support YOUR accusation with any facts. Instead, you chose to bring up a dialogue which you have made up. Even this dialogue is not accurate in any sense. Where did you dig up this one? Do you actually believe that such a dialogue occurs? Worse yet, you seem to think that this dialogue is scientific. This is nothing but an expanded "I'm right and you're wrong" argument between two arrogant bastards with a little twist thrown in to make it look like creationists are nice guys who know everything. Cute. So where is your proof? How do you get around the fact that God cannot be scientific? How about answering the original question which you conveniently avoided? For references, here is your feable dialogue: > ========================================================================= > Scientific Dialogue??? > > Punctuationist: Evolution could not have occured gradually. There is no > evidence for it. Stasis is the norm. > > Gradualist: Preposterous! Evolution must have occurred gradually. With > all the latest genetic discoveries we are sure to find PROOF! > > Punctuationist: Gradualism is out. NO EVIDENCE!! > > Gradualist: Punctuationism is ridiculous. Hopeful monsters are a myth! > > Creationist: I agree with both of your last comments! > > Gradualist and Punctuationist: Shut up! What an unscientific statement! > > Creationist: At least I'm consistent! ___________________________________________________________________________ Live long and answer those *@#!! questions! Keebler { hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.arpa }