[net.origins] We Agree!

dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois) (05/24/85)

>> [Paul DuBois]
>> Okay, fine.  A creationist text, therefore suspect.  Still poisoning
>> the well.  Yes, some additional corroborative material would have been
>> useful.  But have you got something other than a bare assertion that
>> "the only thing breeders can talk about is the RATE at which change can
>> be produced"?

> [Mike Huybensz}
> Flavoring the well at worst: making sure people check the quality before
> imbibing.

Ok.  I'm satisfied with that.

> Guess what my major was for my first three years at Cornell?  Plant breeding.
> Must I get out and reread my plant breeding texts to say that they don't
> discuss long-term limits to change?

I'm glad that we have your expertise to draw on.

-- 
                                                                    |
Paul DuBois     {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois        --+--
                                                                    |
                                                                    |