hua@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Ernest Hua) (05/30/85)
___________________________________________________________________________ Dan, get this crap off net.origins. Until you get the difference between religion and science straight, stay out of net.origins. >From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich) > >>>Evolution had no beginning? Sounds like Hinduism! What kind of science >>>is this? Is this net.ORIGINS or net.naturalflow? >> >>I resent your implied criticism of Hinduism! If you want to flame about the >>ignorant pagans who have not accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior, >>please do so in net.religion.bigot!!! > >I resent your ability to read in to my statement exactly what you >would like to hear and not what it actually says! > >I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism! I am criticizing the statement that >Evolution has no beginning. If special beginning implies religion >(Genesis), than no beginning equally implies religion (Hinduism). > >AGAIN, I AM NOT criticizing Hinduism, I am criticizing a so-called >scientific theory for being amazingly similar to religion. Which >is exactly what evolutionists do about creationism. ___________________________________________________________________________ "F.O.A.D." Keebler { hua@cmu-cs-gandalf.arpa }