[net.origins] To Arndt and the woman who's letter he posted without permission

beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Beth Christy) (05/29/85)

(I'm referring to Message-ID: <2328@decwrl.UUCP>, From: arndt@lymph.DEC.)

To the unnamed woman who's arcticle Arndt posted without permission:
  >[you said]
  >>	I realise from reading the net for a few months that it is
  >>probably foolish, rash and futile to reply to one of your postings
  >>....

  You were right.

To Arndt:
  >                  ** Am I really that bad?

  Yup.


I'd respond to the rest of the article, but I'm a pretty good typist
already, and don't feel a particular need for more practice.

-- 

--JB                                          Life is just a bowl.

padraig@utastro.UUCP (Padraig Houlahan) (05/31/85)

> 
> (I'm referring to Message-ID: <2328@decwrl.UUCP>, From: arndt@lymph.DEC.)
> 
> To the unnamed woman who's arcticle Arndt posted without permission:
>   >[you said]
>   >>	I realise from reading the net for a few months that it is
>   >>probably foolish, rash and futile to reply to one of your postings
>   >>....
> 
>   You were right.
> 
> To Arndt:
>   >                  ** Am I really that bad?
> 
>   Yup.

But how could this be? Ken is not a techie nerd, has a mental age greater
than thirteen years, and is of the twentieth century. He has also taken
a philosophy course.

It's hard to reconcile all of these with his tachie behaviour.

:-)

Padraig Houlahan.