[net.origins] Guess ew said that? What was left out.

bill@utastro.UUCP (William H. Jefferys) (08/12/85)

Being back in my office today, I finally have access to my copy of
*Origin of Species*.  Here's the original posting:

> 	To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances
> 	for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting
> 	different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical
> 	and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural
> 	selection, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.

Here's the rest of the paragraph, which Creationists always leave out:

"When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world
turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the 
doctrine false; but the old saying of *Vox populi, vox Dei*, as
every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science.  Reason
tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and 
imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist,
each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the 
case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be
inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations
should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of
life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex
eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable
by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of
the theory.  How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly
concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may
remark that, as some of the lowest organisms, in which nerves
cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not
seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode
should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed
with this special sensibility."  *Origin of Species*, Mentor
Edition, pp. 168-169.

I will leave it to the reader to decide whether the original
poster quoted Darwin out of context.  I am glad to see that
Paul Dubois thinks so, though I naturally disagree with some
of Paul's other comments.  But the two of us have already 
beaten this topic to death quite some time ago, and I see
no reason to revive *that* discussion!

-- 
"Men never do evil so cheerfully and so completely as when they do so from
	religious conviction."  -- Blaise Pascal

	Bill Jefferys  8-%
	Astronomy Dept, University of Texas, Austin TX 78712   (USnail)
	{allegra,ihnp4}!{ut-sally,noao}!utastro!bill	(uucp)
	bill%utastro.UTEXAS@ut-sally.ARPA		(ARPANET)