[net.abortion] question is not irrelevant

dolan@ihnp1.UUCP (Mike Dolan) (03/12/84)

"rabbit!jj" in an earlier article claimed that the ability to exist
outside of the womb without extraordinary mechanical support was the
distinguishing criteria of a human being.  In a followup to that
article I asked stated that if that criteria was applied evenly,
someone on a life-support system in a critical care unit of a
hospital would not be considered human.  I asked how that fact could
be reconciled with the stated claim.

In a response, "rabbit!jj" said that my question was irrelevant
because 
	"A human being on a heart/lung machine is ALREADY a human
	 being."

My question is not irrelevant.  If the ability to live outside the
womb without extraordinary mechanical support is the basis for
declaring someone to be a human being, then the absence of that
ability is the basis for declaring someone to no longer be a human
being.  "rabbit!jj's" statement that I quoted above implies some
other attribute that makes one a human being.

I will stick my neck out and interpret what I think is the
underlying thought in the above quote.  I stand ready to be
corrected if I am wrong.  It seems that "rabbit!jj" is stating that
when a child can live outside the womb without extraordinary
mechanical support, it has proven itself to be a human being.  Which
is a much different statement than that the ability to live outside
the womb without extraordinary mechanical support is what makes one
a human being.

So, let me go back to my original question.  If the newly born child
is a human being, and the fertilized ovum is not, then what is it
that makes that "thing" into a human being during the time in the
womb, and when does it occur?  

Have a good day,
Mike Dolan
AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
ihnp4!ihnp1!dolan

jj@rabbit.UUCP (03/12/84)

Well, Mike, your qeustion was indeed irrevelant.

Your summation of my answer isn't far wrong.
You state quite clearly the point at which a fetus
becomes a human (at least according to me, except for
the use of the maliciously emotional "proves" in the statement,
a small dishonesty on your part, as far as I'm concerned).  You then ask when a
fetus becomes human according to me.  I suspect that you
are trying to set me up for another falacious argument,
and I'm geting sick of it.

Please read your own article to find the answer to your question.
You answered it quite nicely.

I guess I should expect you to use deliberate emotional
tricks, and I should expect you to try to mislead the
reader into believing that I haven't answered your
question when you've even stated the answer yourself,
but I don't know why I should have to deal with such
an unreasonable method of debate.  

If you can state my position for yourself, sir, then
why do you have to ask again what the position is?
<I suspect the answer is to make emotional points
with the reader, but I'd like YOU to answer that question
and find out what you think is the answer.>

Please, as usual, leave religious belief out of the discussion,
since that's a matter of faith, and you have neither the right nor
the permission to make your faith mine.
-- 
TEDDY BEARS ARE NICER THAN PEOPLE--
HUG YOUR OWN TODAY !
(allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj

jj@rabbit.UUCP (03/12/84)

For a bit of clarification, 
let's assume that I operate under the following generality:
	"Once human, always human, until death."

That very neatly separates the question of what happens
to a person on a heart lung machine.

The definition of death is still sticky, and I'll 
stipulate that.  My own somewhat shaky (due to the
lack of the human being to forsee the future) definition
is that any human is dead if and ONLY if there is no chance
that that person can ever function again in any capacity
other than a repository for not yet expired bodily organs.
I.E. Someone who's cerebral cortex has been totally destroyed
is no longer human, even if their heart, lungs, digestive
system, and so on are completely intact, 
but someone in a coma who has a chance
of becoming functional again is still alive.  

<Yes, I know how hard it is to tell.  That's why I hesitate to 
define death any more strongly.>
-- 
TEDDY BEARS ARE NICER THAN PEOPLE--
HUG YOUR OWN TODAY !
(allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj