jj@rabbit.UUCP (03/21/84)
>From alice!allegra!ulysses!harpo!decvax!ittvax!bunker!bunkerb!garys Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 >... >I'll buy that. Abortion results from a careless attitude about life. >Certainly, a careless attitude about life is a bad thing. Thus, it >seems clear that abortion is a bad thing. (Typically bad causes have >bad effects.) >... >You left out infanticide. >... Well. There we have it again. "Abortion results from a careless attitude about life." Thank you, Gary, for explaing that to me. Let me ask you now, is abortion a result of a careless attitude toward life, or do people who aren't careless sometimes need abortions? <I don't know of any 100% birth control methods, and abstinence isn't a method. (It might be for you, but religious reasons are ONLY for those who believe, not for those who don't share your beliefs.) > Do you honestly believe that ALL unwillingly pregnant women are careless? If you do, sir, I suggest that you study the subject. I also suggest you study the economics of the situation. <Find out how much contraceptive devices cost(including all the necessary expendable items). Tell me how a welfare mother can afford same. For that matter, how about a student, or any person with a low or non-existant income.> I was going to go on to comment on your use of the word infanticide, but I think I'll stop here, I'm getting too annoyed with your projection of your ethics onto everyone else. Please ignore my .signature, I don't feel quite that cheerful at the moment. End pointless torture! -- TEDDY BEARS ARE NICER THAN PEOPLE--HUG YOURS TODAY! (If you go out in the woods today ... ) (allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj
garys@bunkerb.UUCP (Gary Samuelson) (03/22/84)
Now I know how other people feel to whom rabbit!jj has "responded." I write a reply to something that Sophie Quigley wrote, and he yanks my response to her completely out of context. You can't even tell what I was replying to. Not one word of the article to which I was responding appears in jj's "response." Otherwise, he might have noticed that most of what he quoted from my response was actually in agreement with the original (Sophie's) article. Oh well. I guess if you have been quoted out of context and flamed at by someone like rabbit!jj you must have said something important. Gary Samuelson
jj@rabbit.UUCP (03/23/84)
Damit, Gary, I see you like to lie, too. Take another look at my article. I specifically say that I am departing from your article after I make one point concerning a QUOTE of it. I see that you just like to jump on a trend and make fun of people who don't agree with you, and since you think that rabbit!jj is already a tempting target, you use him to take your frustrations out on. You should do TWO things. 1) Apologize to this newsgroup for making a totally off the wall, ad-hominem attack that wasn't in net.flame. 2) Go back and READ what you wrote, and what I wrote, and then apologize to me. Stuff it. -- TEDDY BEARS ARE NICER THAN PEOPLE--HUG YOURS TODAY! (If you go out in the woods today ... ) (allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj
garys@bunkerb.UUCP (Gary Samuelson) (03/26/84)
For my response to rabbit!jj's attacks on my character, see net.flame. Gary Samuelson