psuvm%v6m@psuvax.UUCP (03/28/84)
ow that I agree with. As a side note this is one good reason to keep and
arry arms as in bill of rights...but I digress.
ow would I categorize the respondent?? meeting obligations of parenthood.
s for the answer he gave:
The pro-lifers would save BOTH!!!! (methods would be debated of course)
The pro-choicers , I don't think would make this a pro-choice issue and
would fall back on personal ethics. After all the baby is ALIVE. the
hoice was made.
usually get too infuriated over kenn the kenf when I read his postings
'll respond to the parts later, if Paul Dubuc doesn't beat me to it.
heers fellow comabatants.
Marchionni V6M@psuvm.bitnet