flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul Torek) (01/10/85)
[] In a recent reply to Sophie Quigley I said, "Not that I am answering your questions exactly as asked ...". That should read, "NOTE that I am answering ...". Now, on to the next question. From: ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig) > Can someone please explain to me why abortion should > have a different legal status than killing animals? Sure: abortion is OK, but killing animals is wrong. People who believe otherwise are mistaken. This is not my real view, but it shows how questions like this should be answered. --the aspiring iconoclast
daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader) (01/11/85)
> > Can someone please explain to me why abortion should > > have a different legal status than killing animals? > > Sure: abortion is OK, but killing animals is wrong. People who > believe otherwise are mistaken. > > This is not my real view, but it shows how questions like > this should be answered. > --the aspiring iconoclast The same way you answer all your questions. -- The Last Surviving Bronto