[net.abortion] plugs and ethics

jay@npois.UUCP (Anton Winteroak) (03/20/85)

	Before going into plugs and ethics, I agree with Mikki's point
about what are we fighting for, why not work together to find ways to
eventually make abortion needless, rather than difficult.

	But on my main topic, I read in a recent issue of Science News
that a reversable form of sterilization involving plugging up the tubes
with plastic corks, and putting plastic clips on the outside has been
fairly successfully tested on baboons.
	They were 100 percent effective, and 90 percent reversable. 
	My question is to you people who oppose some methods of birth
control. Presuming that these could be made 99+ percent reversable, would
these be okay for mass voluntary use. They do not kill zygotes, only
prevent them. Is there some other problem that you have with birth
control? Widespread use of these would certainly reduce abortions
quite a bit. I know you aren't inclined to pick the lesser of two evils
when you think you can stamp out both, but I'd like to hear your opinions
about this.

	In a completely unrelated ethical question, If the zygote/foetus
is human, and due the rights afforded humans, should it then also be
charged with the responsibilities of a human. How do you feel about
ectopic pregnancies? Should a child be locked up if a complication of
his/her birth kills the mother? If these questions make you angry, please
just answer about the plugs. I really was just asking to find out how
you feel about these grey areas.

		...!ahuta!npois!jay       Anton Winteroak