bmt@we53.UUCP ( B. M. Thomas ) (04/10/85)
The same attitude results both in killing unborn children and in abusing born ones. This is the same attitude that has been chillingly displayed, without apology or remorse, by some of you who feel, as I said in a previous article, that "it's my right and I don't give a damn who it hurts!" The real issues are coming out, aren't they? You are now saying what I have been saying, but the abortionists' PR has been denying - that if I want a baby killed, I don't care what anyone else says, it's my right. The courts have been saying it too. The courts are not pro-choice, they are pro-dead-baby. Recent court decisions have upheld ANYONE's right to a dead baby. If the mother wants an abortion and the father doesn't, the mother's right is upheld. If the father wants his child aborted and the mother doesn't, the father's rights are upheld. If the mother is a minor and wants an abortion and her parents don't, the minor's rights are upheld. If the mother is a minor and the parents want the baby aborted and she doesn't, the parents' rights are upheld. So please stop the lying about being "pro-choice". You're NOT.
suki@reed.UUCP (Monica Nosek) (04/11/85)
In article <319@we53.UUCP> bmt@we53.UUCP ( B. M. Thomas ) writes: > The courts are not pro-choice, they are pro-dead-baby. >Recent court decisions have upheld ANYONE's right to a dead baby. If the mother >wants an abortion and the father doesn't, the mother's right is upheld. If the >father wants his child aborted and the mother doesn't, the father's rights are >upheld. If the mother is a minor and wants an abortion and her parents don't, >the minor's rights are upheld. If the mother is a minor and the parents want >the baby aborted and she doesn't, the parents' rights are upheld. Is this true? I can't believe that a man could force his wife or girlfriend to undergo an abortion. Not through legal means, anyway. Could you post some more information on this? > So please >stop the lying about being "pro-choice". You're NOT. But I AM. Monica tektronix!reed!suki
bonnie@tut.UUCP (Bonnie Norman) (04/21/85)
In article <> bmt@we53.UUCP writes: >Recent court decisions have upheld ANYONE's right to a dead baby. If the mother >wants an abortion and the father doesn't, the mother's right is upheld. If the >father wants his child aborted and the mother doesn't, the father's rights are >upheld. If the mother is a minor and wants an abortion and her parents don't, >the minor's rights are upheld. If the mother is a minor and the parents want >the baby aborted and she doesn't, the parents' rights are upheld. This sure is news to me. Could you send me more information on this? My ex would be REAL interested to know that there were legal means of forcing me to have an abortion. Could he have had me locked up for refusing to do what he wanted me to? Or maybe he just could have hit me with a heavy fine. Hmmm. I guess I'm having a hard time believing this bit of pro-life babble. >So please, stop the lying about being "pro-choice". You're NOT. I think you need to be more specific about who you're addressing this to. You may think that people who call themselves *pro-choice* are really just *pro-deadbaby*, but I've got a 3-year old doing somersaults across my feet right now who would just love to prove you wrong. I claim to be pro-choice and I AM. I WANTED to have this child - but I've never condemned anyone else for making a different decision. So please, stop the generalizations about people who don't agree with you.