csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe) (08/13/85)
Thomas Newton flames: >Do you feel sorry for would-be murderers who die from botched illegal >murders? ... Women who have abortions and the abortionists who perform >the operation are trying to harm someone else. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think, therefore I am. Would you please state your argument that the fetus is a concious being before you make such ad hominem arguments? Perhaps, I should rally against heart transplants, after all, why does one heart loss its right to life just because it doesn't work that well? >I don't see how the fetuses would lose any more in unsterile illegal abortions >than they currently do in legal ones. You could not have provided a more lucid example of your anti-woman sentiments. What about the WOMEN? Oh yeah, they're MURDERERS (an assertion with no legal evidence) and don't have any rights. I'm sickened by this attitude. >After all, the point of abortions is to kill fetuses. Like I said: and NOT WOMEN! >The only difference between a legal abortion and an illegal one from the >fetus's point of view... The fetus doesn't HAVE a point of veiw; in fact, it has less of a point of veiw than the average gerbil. Your argument is ludicrous. >Can you see any differences between "it's OK for someone to victimize >you" and "it's not OK for someone to victimize you"? That's an easy distinction to make, what about victimizing women? -- Charles Forsythe CSDF@MIT-VAX "I was going to say something really profound, but I forgot what it was." -Rev. Wang Zeep