thoma@reed.UUCP (Ann Muir Thomas) (10/10/85)
*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE *** I heard today of a girl whose parents threw her out of the house because she had an abortion. She will never be welcomed back. You call this "better pro-life morals"? Ann (BTW, Mr. Dubuc seems to manipulating us by always saying "she" when referring to a fetus. Take note!)
charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips) (10/14/85)
> >I heard today of a girl whose parents threw her out of the house >because she had an abortion. She will never be welcomed back. > >You call this "better pro-life morals"? > >Ann And I've heard of girls who were thrown out because they *wouldn't* have abortions. So what is that supposed to prove? charli
kurtzman@uscvax.UUCP (Stephen Kurtzman) (10/17/85)
In article <367@cylixd.UUCP> charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips) writes: >> >>I heard today of a girl whose parents threw her out of the house >>because she had an abortion. She will never be welcomed back. >> >>You call this "better pro-life morals"? >> >>Ann > >And I've heard of girls who were thrown out because they *wouldn't* >have abortions. So what is that supposed to prove? > > charli It proves people of all races, creeds, and what-have-yous can be s**theads. I think the original posting was probably meant to imply that the pro-life groups cannot claim the moral high-ground on this issue. It failed to do that. But it does serve to show that people on both sides of the issue can be both thoughtless and heartless.
pwk@ccice2.UUCP (Paul W. Karber) (10/21/85)
In article <1989@reed.UUCP> thoma@reed.UUCP (Ann Muir Thomas) writes: >I heard today of a girl whose parents threw her out of the house >because she had an abortion. She will never be welcomed back. >You call this "better pro-life morals"? No. I call in intolerance, which has nothing to do with the true(*) pro-life position. (*) I have also noticed that some people (who will remain nameless) oppose abortion on purely religious and/or moral grounds that do not seem concerned with whether the fetus is a life or not. I would not consider this a true pro-life position. >Ann >(BTW, Mr. Dubuc seems to manipulating us by always saying "she" >when referring to a fetus. Take note!) Ah, my feelings are hurt. I've been trying to manipulate you by using gender neutral pronouns, and you didn't even notice. :-) But seriously now, do you believe that some of our readers think one sex is better then the other? Unless one believes a particular sex is superior how can the choice of pronoun affect you? -- Of course I could be wrong. siesmo!rochester!ccice5!ccice2!pwk
vch@rruxo.UUCP (Kerro Panille) (10/28/85)
>But seriously now, do you believe that some of our readers >think one sex is better then the other? Unless one believes >a particular sex is superior how can the choice of pronoun >affect you? Personally, I think WOMEN are MUCH better. (but I guess that's just my personal preference... They're much more fun!) -- Vince Hatem ---------------- A Bell Communications Research | UZI |----------|_ _ _\/ T Raritan River Software Systems Center | |----------| /\ & 444 Hoes Lane ---------------- ROGER GUTS T 4D-360 / /\ DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' Piscataway, NJ 08854 / / TIES (201) 699-4869 /-----/ ...ihnp4!rruxo!vch TRUE GRIT MYSTERIES - The detective series for those who NEVER eat quiche! (WARNING - MAY BE EMOTIONALLY DISTURBING TO HAMSTER LOVERS)