axm9839@acf4.UUCP (Asher Meth) (05/20/84)
A gutteh voch to all / Shavu'ah tov. Or leyom rishon leparshas Bamidbar (bemidbar, in the pasuk), (motzaei shabbos kodesh leparshas bechukosai), 18 IYAR 5744, 33 days in the 'Omer - LAG BAOMER. context : comment of Eli Posner on 'korbon pesach', Sanhedrin, and korbonos in general. >I really don't know the reason why no one acts and does this, but >I suspect it's because people wouldn't be comfortable to see this because >they aren't used to it. They are probably waiting for the Messiah. >--- >Eli Posner Aren't we all ??? Ani ma-amin be-emunah sheleimah bevias hamashiach, veaf al pi sheyismahmeiah, im kol tzeh achakeh lo bechol yom sheyavo !!! (I realize that the inference was probably *not* meant, but it was there and was too open to misinterpretation.) Asher Meth allegra!cmcl2!acf4!axm9839
bleich@acf4.UUCP (Chaya Bleich) (05/20/84)
Eli Posner states as a matter of fact that most, if not all of the sacrifices could be brought "b'zman ha-zeh". There are serious halachik questions at stake, and the issue is not as clear-cut as Eli makes it sound. My father (Rabbi J.D. Bleich) wrote a survey of the responsa regarding this question, entitled "reinstitution of the sacrificial order", which appeared in Tradition in Fall 1962 and has been reprinted in Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Vol. 1. I am going out of town tomorrow, so I don't have time to list the "marei mekomos" but it is quite a long list. I just want to point out that the question isn't quite as simple as Eli makes it sound. Chaya Bleich allegra!cmcl2!acf4!bleich
axm9839@acf4.UUCP (05/22/84)
Yom sheini leparshas Bamidbar, 19 IYAR 5744, 34 days in the Omer. > My father (Rabbi J.D. Bleich) wrote a survey of the responsa > regarding this question, entitled "reinstitution of the > sacrificial order", which appeared in Tradition in Fall >>>> 1962 and has been reprinted in Contemporary Halakhic > Problems, Vol. 1. I am going out of town tomorrow, > so I don't have time to list the "marei mekomos" > but it is quite a long list. I just want to point > out that the question isn't quite as simple as Eli > makes it sound. > Chaya Bleich > allegra!cmcl2!acf4!bleich One correction, please. that should say Tradition, Fall '67 (not '62). Asher Meth allegra!cmcl2!acf4!axm9839
martillo@ihuxt.UUCP (Yehoyaqim Martillo) (06/02/84)
I just skimmed over Chaya Bleich's father's article in contemporary halakhic problems. He notes that the sefer haxinuk states that rebuilding the beyt hamiqdas: becomes obligatory when the majority of Jews resides in the land of Israel. In view of American Jews' desire to commit ethnic suicide, this obligation will become incumbent on Jews in around 25 years. Whether we can reinstitute the sacrifices and whether we can rebuild the temple, my grandfather, hakam Hasan, was of the opinion that the various Muslim structures on Temple Mount should be knocked down. The various Muslim commentators are quite explicit that Muslim possession of Temple Mount demonstrates the truth of Islam and is a graphic expression of Jewish subjugation. In various Arabic journals, I now and then see the reluctance to knock these buildings down taken as evidence that we Jews know we will eventually loose the Land of Israel, that we will once again become dhimmis (subjects), and that the land of Israel is still part of the dar al-Islam (the House of Islam). The opinion of most Muslim scholars is that a Muslim must leave a land which has irrevocably left Muslim dominion.