wkp@lanl.ARPA (03/01/85)
[This posting got garbled up on the way to the Press. Sorry.] Subject: Re: Hypocrisy--or, who is a mamzer? Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish References: <22536@lanl.ARPA> <3780016@csd2.UUCP> In replying to my posting, Pinchus Klahr not only got my last name wrong, but completely misrepresented my position. I did not maintain that lack of a religious circumcision made a Jew a mamzer. Mr. Klahr, before you respond to any of my articles, please get the facts straight. Thanks! In Asher Schechter's response, he made two points which I would like to see discussed. 1. Can any one quote the sources for what I thought to be a halachic principle that a Jew who had a cirmcumcision incorrectly done had to have it redone? The only thing I could find was from the Shulchan Aruch stating that "the mohel should be versed in the laws of milah" (163:1). Since most secular circumcisions are done via gentiles (or nowadays, machines), I view this as an incomplete brit milah, and thus invalid. The Lubavitchers that I prayed 5 years with also agree to this principle. (I believe that their view was that such a Jew was therefore not part of the covenant, and HAD TO UNDERGO A RITUAL BRIT MILAH (the shedding of blood from the foreskin, etc.). Since the Lubavitchers are part of the Theocratic Politicos calling for a ritual immersion for the Ethiopians, my charge of hypocrisy still stands. 2. Again, it was my understanding that a Jew born of a Jewess not following Taharat Mishpachah was a mamzer. Can someone give me sources for this? I remember reading it in a yeshiva class; also Martillo mentioned it once on the net. (My talmud is in Jerusalem). Thanks in advance to anybody who can help. --- bill peter {ihnp4,seismo}!cmcl2!lanl!wkp "Ben Azzai said, 'Do not be scornful of any person and do not be disdainful of anything, for there is no person without his hour and no thing without its place.'" ---
martillo@mit-athena.UUCP (Joaquim Martillo) (03/03/85)
I do not remember ever stating that a child born of a woman not following tohorat hamishpahah was a momzer. I do remember reading it in an article by someone on the net I considered knowledgeable. I do believe I stated once the (lone) opinion of Yehudah haTeimani (?) that the child of a Jewish woman and a non-Jewish man is a momzer. Yehoyaqim Martillo