[net.religion.jewish] Weekly Dvar Torah : Parashat Shmini

DAEMON@TECHUNIX.BITNET (04/17/85)

From: 0210097@techunix.bitnet (Ephraim Silverberg)

---------------------------------cut-here--------------------------------------






                                                        BS"D

                      Parashat Shmini

     INTRODUCTION

          This dvar torah is based on  material  taken  from
     Likutei  Sichot  of  Rabbi  Menachem Mendel Schneersohn
     ("The Lubavitcher Rebbe") on  Parashat  Shmini  and  on
     "B'Urim  L'Pirkei Avot" compiled from the discourses of
     the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Kehot  Publishing  Company,  New
     York,  5742.   Insertions  of  the form "editor's note"
     appear between (square) brackets.

     DISCLAIMER

          Any idea or thought expressed in this  Dvar  Torah
     is solely my responsibilty.  Any errors or misinterpre-
     tations should be blamed on myself alone and  *not*  be
     attributed to my sources. Please direct all comments or
     complaints to:

          BITNET  : 0210097@techunix
          ARPANET : 0210097%techunix.bitnet@wiscvm.arpa
          UUCP    : {almost anywhere}!ucbvax!UCBJADE!TECHUNIX:0210097
          CSNET   : 0210097%techunix.BITNET@csnet-relay

     DVAR TORAH

          In the chapter of Pirkei Avot of this week  starts
     of  with the following Mishna: "Rebi says: which is the
     just path that a man should choose -- that which brings
     splendour  for  those that follow it and splendour from
     other men".  [1] The Rebbe  [referring  to  the  Lubav-
     itcher  Rebbe,  likewise for all subsequent references]
     asks the following questions:

     (1)  What type of question is "which is the  just  path
          that a man should choose" ?!  The Torah guides our
          path as it is explicitly stated: "The ways of  G-d
          are just".  [2]  The  question  in  hand  must  be
          referring  to choosing a "just" path in the obser-
          vance of the Torah and this fact  must  be  eluci-
          dated.

     (2)  How is it possible to say  (especially  concerning
          behaviour  beyond  the  requirements of the strict
          law [this principle that  Pirkei  Avot  refers  to
          acting  above  and  beyond the requirements of the
          Law  repeats   itself   throughout   the   Rebbe's
_________________________
  [1] Avot II:1.
  [2] Hosea 14:10.




Parashat Shmini       26 Nisan, 5745          Pirkei Avot II





                           - 2 -                        BS"D


          commentaries on Pirkei Avot]) that  the  measuring
          stick  by  which  a  man should choose his path in
          life is the one that is pleasant for him  ("brings
          spendour  for  those that follow it") and also, he
          takes into account what people  think  of  him  so
          that  path  should  find  favour  in people's eyes
          ("splendour from other men")?

     (3)  What is the connection  with  the  author  of  the
          Mishna  --  Rebi  [Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi -- this is
          another of the Rebbe's principles in the interpre-
          tation of Pirkei Avot -- that the author is intri-
          cately connected with the actual saying]?

          The Rebbe explains: "spendour for those that  fol-
     low  it" refers to a man's divine service regarding his
     own self-improvement (in generel -- the path of Torah),
     and  "splendour  from  other men" -- the divine service
     directed towards his fellow man (the  path  of  G'Milut
     Chassadim  [Kindness  towards  others]).  And the "just
     path" -- which is beyond the strict requirement of  the
     Law  --  is to merge and equalise both these paths.  It
     is within the power of man to guide his deeds  so  that
     his divine service will encompass both these manners of
     divine service (even though they  may  seem  contradic-
     tory)  and  in  such  a way as the merging shall not be
     lacking, but each aspect will be in  itself  completely
     fulfilled.

          And this idea is particularly  applicable  to  the
     author, Rebi, for the following reasons:

     (i)  Rebi was  the  Nasi  [often  translated  "Prince",
          denoting  that  he  was the head of the Sanhedrin,
          high court, and, therefore, regarded as the spiri-
          tual leader of the generation], and the Nasi has a
          particular need  to  encompass  both  these  paths
          since  the  leader  of the generation must give up
          his self-interests and devote his energies to  the
          needs  of his generation, which is not necessarily
          the case with a private individual who could  pos-
          sibly choose one path  only,  [3]  however,  Rebi,
          being  the  "shepherd"  of  Israel, made sure that
          both these attributes be present in each and every
          one.

     [2]  It is known  that  Tiferet,  "splendour",  is  the
          attribute  of Jacob, and we find a special connec-
          tion between Rebi and Jacob as Nasi is an  acronym
          for  Nitzutzo  Shel  Yaakov Avinu [spark of Jacob,
_________________________
  [3] See Likutei Sichot, Section 2, Page 320  and  the
additions to Section 3 of Keter Shem Tov.




Parashat Shmini       26 Nisan, 5745          Pirkei Avot II





                           - 3 -                        BS"D


          our  forefather  --  the  acronym  works  out   in
          Hebrew],  and  Rebi  was the only Nasi to have the
          word "Nasi" made part of his name -- Rabbi Yehudah
          HaNasi.   Therefore, Rebi instructs us to choose a
          "just path" that is "tiferet for those that follow
          it and tiferet from other men".  [4]

          This lesson  is  paticularly  applicable  to  this
     week's  Parasha  where we witness the death of Aharon's
     sons, Nadav and Avihu.  The Rebbe explains  in  Likutei
     Sichot  that  the root of the reason that brought about
     their death [as to the actual Halachic reason why  they
     deserved  death, there are a multitude of varying opin-
     ions] was a "defect" in their manner of divine service.
     A  person's  divine  service must consist of Ratzo (the
     seeking of closeness to G-d by way of divesting oneself
     of  one's  material  limitations  through  intellectual
     striving in  Torah)  and  Shov  (the  drawing  back  --
     through  fear  of G-d -- to this world, enabling one to
     physically perform the Mitzvot in this material  world)
     [these  phrase  come  from  the verse: "And the Chayyot
     drew forward (Ratzo) and back (Shov)" [5] ].  Nadav and
     Avihu attained a spiritual level greater than Moses and
     Aharon [6] , but there service was that of  Ratzo  only
     without  the  necessary counterbalance of Shov.  There-
     fore there souls were consumed by fire [7] , since they
     were  so  divested  of  this  world  that they could no
     longer remain in a physical body.

          The lesson to our generation is clear: it  is  not
     sufficient  to  worry  about  one's own spiritual needs
     without taking into account the needs of  one's  fellow
     Jew;  on  the other hand, one who fulfills his "humane"
     obligations, but neglects the Torah has  not  completed
     his task in this world as a Jew.

          May we all strive to be faithful to the Torah  and
     to  our  fellow Jews and may we be privleged to witness
     the speedy Redemption of all the Jewish people with the
     coming  of  Moshiach  Tzidkanu,  speedily  in our days.
     Shabbat Shalom.







_________________________
  [4] Kehilat Yaakov Ma'arechet Rebi.
  [5] Ezekiel 1:14.
  [6] See Rashi on Leviticus 10:3.
  [7] See Rashi on Leviticus 10:8.




                    WE WANT MOSHIACH NOW


--------------------------------until-here-------------------------------------

teitz@aecom.UUCP (04/22/85)

>      (i)  Rebi was  the  Nasi  [often  translated  "Prince",
>           denoting  that  he  was the head of the Sanhedrin,
>           high court, and, therefore, regarded as the spiri-
>           tual leader of the generation], and the Nasi has a

	The position of nasi was different from the position of Av Bet Din.
 The av bet din was the head of th sanhedrin, while the nasi was the leader
 ( political leader ) of the Jewish nation.

			Eliyahu Teitz.