[net.misc] St. Christopher

features@ihuxf.UUCP (M.A. Zeszutko) (02/01/84)

(St. Christopher)..."didn't he get court-martialled and convicted
in absentia by some recent pope for having been ilegitimate?" 

Not really.  At least not if you consider "illegitimate" as being
born out of wedlock.  The Vatican officials had some reason to
believe that belief in St. Christopher (and in a raft of other,
lesser-known saints) was merely a pious myth.  (Somewhat akin to
belief in Superman, on the secular side.)  Thus, they weren't
sure whether or not these folks ever existed, or whether they
were merely made up.

Incidentally, the canonization process (the route one has to travel
to be declared a saint) has gotten MUCH more stringent in the 
past 200 or so years.  In the early Church (<600), saints were
named by popular acclaim.  (If things were done now the way
they were then, Mother Theresa of Calcutta would already be
sainted.)

M. A. Zeszutko  AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL

rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen) (02/04/84)

I hate to say it ("No he doesn't."--ED.)  but if religions are going
to "desanctify" saints and other holy figures on the grounds that they
don't have sufficient proof of their existence, how long will it be
before they get rid of god?  Playing "devil's advocate" here ("OOH, that
hurts."--ED.) if St. Christopher has significant symbolic meaning to large
numbers of people, how can he be "abolished" while keeping the rest of the
religion around?  Does it boil down to "my unprovable beliefs are more
correct than yours"?

(It's just a question)
-- 
Pardon me for breathing...
	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr

rrizzo@bbncca.ARPA (Ron Rizzo) (02/09/84)

I understand your point, Rich, & probably agree with you.  But if it's
not being boorish to make the further point....:  saints as defined by
the RCC are supposed to be historical human beings (why not merely mor-
tals, including animals?  I don't see why not having souls makes them
incapable of performing miracles; the Vatican is human-chauvinist!), i.e.
individuals who really existed.  Unlike deities or angels (or devils).

The RCC certainly favors symbols (the goddess Virgin Mary, a veritable
one-spirit pantheon of every female deity of antiquity, including Hecate).
It simply has this thing about saints: like theologians and most heretics,
they ought to be real folks.  Perhaps the reason why is that canonization is 
a procedure exclusively owned by one of the Vatican bureaucracies.  It's not
bureaucratically nice to deal in complete (as opposed to partial) fictions.

					Cheers,
					Ron Rizzo