etan@tellab1.UUCP (Nate Stelton) (12/05/84)
I am reposting this because I have strong suspicions that the original posting went in the bit bucket. Winter is virtually upon those of us in the north, and it brings to mind a question that I never did find out the answer to. We would like to increase the relative humidity of our bedroom with a portable unit to supplement the furnace humidifier. Which would do the job better, a room humidifier or a vaporizer? What does one do that the other doesn't? -etan
faiman@uiucdcsb.UUCP (12/06/84)
A room humidifier is a simpler, cheaper mechanism, since it doesn't heat the water. There's no medical evidence, apparently, that heating the water does any good. Also the humidifier usually has a humidistat and air speed control, so that it is more easily set to your comfort. Mike Faiman
net@asgb.UUCP (12/09/84)
A third alternative is an ionizer. It will produce a fine mist of water vapor without making much noise. I have used one every night for the past month or so without experiencing any trouble. advantages disadvantages ionizer quiet expensive (I paid ~$95) works for 8 hours creates "dust" with hard water at full intensity Bob Devine Burroughs-ASG {sdcsvax, sdcrdcf}!bmcg!asgb!moloch!devine